Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Focus groups

R A Powell1, H M Single

  • 1Department of Mental Health, University of Exeter, Wonford House Hospital, UK. R.A.Powell@exeter.ac.uk

International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A decade of deprioritisation? Ethnicity and health in the 10-year NHS plan.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2025
Same author

Kenyan palliative care providers' and leaders' perceptions of palliative care research needs and support to facilitate rigorous research.

BMC palliative care·2023
Same author

Female genital mutilation and the Sustainable Development Goals: The importance of research.

Health care for women international·2017
Same author

Out of the shadows: non-communicable diseases and palliative care in Africa.

BMJ supportive & palliative care·2015
Same author

Palliative care development in Africa: how can we provide enough quality care?

BMJ supportive & palliative care·2014
Same author

Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Africa: a report from the Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI).

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2013
Same journal

The Right to Play in Paediatric Healthcare: Policy and Practice in Chile.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

Also a feeling-how frontline health care professionals construct patient safety.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

Exploring quality and patient safety competencies and competency frameworks: a scoping review.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

Operational inefficiency and perceived quality in a Paediatric Day Hospital: a Lean-informed study of patient flow, caregiver and staff perceptions.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

From compliance to prediction: Clinical Laboratories as digital infrastructure for health-system quality and safety.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
Same journal

The four main domains of the concept of return-on-investment from healthcare quality improvement programmes.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2026
See all related articles

Focus groups offer unique advantages for qualitative health care research. This paper details their benefits, guiding researchers on effective group composition, discussion management, and results analysis for robust data collection.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Qualitative Research Methods

Background:

  • Qualitative research is crucial for understanding health care provision.
  • Existing methods like in-depth interviews have limitations.
  • Focus groups provide a valuable alternative for data collection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce focus group methodology for health care research.
  • To highlight the advantages of focus groups over other qualitative techniques.
  • To provide practical guidelines for conducting focus group research.

Main Methods:

  • The paper reviews focus group methodology as a qualitative data collection technique.
  • It compares focus groups with in-depth interviews and nominal group technique.
  • Guidelines are provided for group composition, discussion management, and data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Focus groups offer distinct advantages for gathering rich qualitative data in health care settings.
  • Effective implementation requires careful planning of participant selection and discussion facilitation.
  • Systematic analysis of focus group data yields valuable insights into health care provision.

Conclusions:

  • Focus group methodology is a powerful tool for health care researchers.
  • Adherence to best practices in design and execution maximizes the utility of focus groups.
  • This method enhances the depth and breadth of understanding in health care research.