Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Normal response to pilocarpine and phenylephrine

R Mapstone

    The British Journal of Ophthalmology
    |August 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Pilocarpine and phenylephrine drops significantly reduced intraocular pressure and increased outflow facility in normal eyes. This response is contrary to what occurs in eyes at risk for closed-angle glaucoma.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Parasympathetic denervation hypersensitivity of the iris in ocular hypertension.

    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·1987
    Same author

    Age-adjusted normal tolerance limits for cardiovascular autonomic function assessment in the elderly.

    Age and ageing·1986
    Same author

    Progression of impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes mellitus in patients with primary glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·1986
    Same author

    Diurnal variation in onset of acute closed angle glaucoma.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1986
    Same author

    Pupil cycle time in primary closed-angle glaucoma.

    Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie·1986
    Same author

    The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the family history of patients with primary glaucoma.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·1986
    Same journal

    Novel technique for treating extraocular muscle adherence after fracture repair.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Safe use of fluorinated gases in vitreoretinal surgery: learning from patient safety incidents with expert panel recommendations from the British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons (BEAVRS).

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Fast progressors in Asian normal-tension glaucoma: 10 years and beyond in a longitudinal cohort.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Identifying patients with poor visual outcomes after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery using machine learning.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Incidence of bilateral disease and choroidal neovascularisation in punctate inner choroiditis.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Reference map of multimodal vision deficits in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: contrast sensitivity and low-contrast visual acuity.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Glaucoma Research
    • Ocular Physiology

    Background:

    • Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness.
    • Provocative tests are used to assess glaucoma risk.
    • Understanding normal eye responses to provocative agents is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the effect of pilocarpine and phenylephrine on intraocular pressure (IOP) and outflow facility in normal eyes.
    • To compare the response in normal eyes to that of eyes at risk for closed-angle glaucoma.

    Main Methods:

    • Fifty-eight normal eyes from 58 patients were provoked with pilocarpine and phenylephrine.
    • A subset of 19 eyes underwent a 'dummy' provocative test for control.
    • Intraocular pressure and outflow facility were measured before and after provocation.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Pilocarpine and phenylephrine caused a significant reduction in IOP.
    • These agents also led to a significant increase in outflow facility.
    • The 'dummy' test showed no significant changes in IOP or outflow facility.

    Conclusions:

    • The pilocarpine/phenylephrine provocative test elicits a response in normal eyes that is opposite to a positive test in eyes susceptible to closed-angle glaucoma.
    • This finding aids in differentiating normal physiological responses from pathological glaucoma risk indicators.