Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implant-protected occlusion

C E Misch1, M W Bides

  • 1Oral Implant Center and Residency, University of Pittsburgh, School of Dental Medicine, USA.

International Journal of Dental Symposia
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An evidence-based review of posterior single-tooth replacement: implants vs fixed partial dentures.

Dentistry today·2009
Same author

What you don't know can hurt you (and your patients).

Dentistry today·2003
Same author

Management of incision design in symphysis graft procedures: a review of the literature.

The Journal of oral implantology·2002
Same author

The importance of dental implants.

General dentistry·2002
Same author

Mandibular bone growth induced by a hydroxylapatite-coated subperiosteal implant: a case report.

The Journal of oral implantology·2002
Same author

Reverse torque testing and early loading failures: help or hindrance?

The Journal of oral implantology·2002

Implant-Protected Occlusion minimizes damaging forces on dental implants by considering force direction, magnification, and implant positioning. This approach enhances implant longevity and bone health.

Area of Science:

  • Dental implantology
  • Biomechanical engineering
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Dental implant success relies on managing forces at the bone-implant interface.
  • Understanding biomechanical principles is crucial for effective implant reconstruction.
  • Factors like force direction and magnification significantly impact implant stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define Implant-Protected Occlusion as an occlusal scheme that reduces forces at the crestal bone/implant interface.
  • To integrate biomechanical principles for a consistent approach to implant reconstruction.
  • To identify modifiable factors that minimize detrimental forces on dental implants.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of biomechanical principles governing force distribution.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of force direction, magnification (cantilevers, offset loads), and implant positioning.
  • Assessment of implant surface area (width, length, number) and occlusal factors (table width, contacts).

    • Main Results:

    • Angled forces increase stress, alter application points, and reduce bone strength.
    • Force magnifiers like cantilevers significantly amplify forces on prostheses.
    • Implant position, bone density, surface area, and occlusal design critically influence force loads.

    Conclusions:

    • Implant-Protected Occlusion is a biomechanically based concept for reducing crestal bone/implant forces.
    • Modifying occlusal table width and contacts can effectively reduce detrimental crestal loads.
    • A comprehensive approach considering force dynamics and implant characteristics is vital for successful dental reconstructions.