Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intravenous line diameter: is bigger really better?

D Leibovici1, O N Gofrit, B Fredman

  • 1Department of Urology, Assaf-Harofe Medical Center, Zrifin, Israel.

Military Medicine
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Intravenous catheter size does not impact cannulation success or duration for military medics. The 14-gauge (14G) catheter is recommended for battlefield use due to similar performance to the 16-gauge (16G) size.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypertriglyceridemia Induced Pancreatitis: plasmapheresis or conservative management?

Journal of intensive care medicine·2021
Same author

A combined intracapsular and extracapsular fracture of the hip.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

[80 years of public-private healthcare services in Assuta].

Harefuah·2015
Same author

The Lancet strikes again.

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ·2015
Same author

Lancets unethical behavior.

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ·2014
Same author

[Perspectives from the 9th Annual Conference on Health Technology Assessment--dealing with personalized medicine in the community, hospitals and organizing knowledge].

Harefuah·2013

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Vascular Access Devices

Background:

  • Effective intravenous (IV) access is critical for battlefield medical care.
  • Catheter size is a potential factor influencing IV cannulation success and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cannulation success rate and procedure duration between 14-gauge (14G) and 16-gauge (16G) intravenous catheters in military medics.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, randomized, controlled crossover study.
  • 114 military medic cadets participated, performing cannulations with both 14G and 16G catheters in the antecubital fossa.
  • Success rate and procedure duration were recorded.

Main Results:

  • Overall success rates were 80% for 14G and 86% for 16G catheters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Average procedure durations were 33 seconds for 14G and 35.2 seconds for 16G.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed between the two catheter sizes for either metric.

    • Conclusions:

    • Intravenous catheter size (14G vs. 16G) does not affect cannulation success or procedure duration.
    • The 14-gauge intravenous catheter is recommended for military medics on the battlefield.