Application of a computer program to exclude additional unexpected antibodies

When a patient has produced red cell (RBC) antibodies in the past, he or she is at risk of producing additional antibodies after antigen challenge. The presence of these antibodies should be excluded before each transfusion. The following criteria are applied when using commercial test RBCs: RBCs should not express the antigen against which the previously documented antibody is directed. For other clinically significant antigens, at least one RBC sample should be from a donor who is homozygous for the encoding gene. The manual selection of such RBCs is tedious and requires experience.

A computer program has been developed that generates exclusion panels (EPs) by selecting a minimum number of RBCs from commercial test panel complying with current criteria. When RBCs from a donor who is homozygous for the encoding gene are absent, the program selects, as a second-best option, RBCs from a donor who is heterozygous for that gene. The computer program developed for this study investigated the usefulness of commercially available panels from separate manufactures in excluding the presence of additional antibodies. A list of 488 antibodies detected by a regional blood bank in 1994 was used as cases of antibodies documented in the past.

In 61 percent of the cases, successful EPs (i.e., those complying with the criteria), consisting of three to four different phenotypes, were selected. In the remaining 39 percent of cases, it was impossible to generate successful EPs: 1 to 2 additional antibodies could not be excluded or could be excluded only by using RBCs from heterozygotes. Commercial panels differed only slightly in their efficiency in providing suitable RBCs. None of the commercial panels could provide suitable RBCs to exclude all additional antibodies in the presence of anti-c, anti-e, or anti-M. Increasing the number of RBCs from which to select EPs only slightly increased the percentage of success.

Computer-aided construction of EPs quickly shows whether strict criteria can be met or whether alternative techniques should be used. It leads to a significant reduction in the number of RBC suspensions necessary to exclude additional antibodies. Results with various commercial panels differed only slightly.