Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Midbrain unit activity during classical conditioning

S E Brauth, J Olds

    Brain Research
    |September 23, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The use of children's religious ideas in their psychiatric evaluation.

    Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
    Same author

    Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive cells and fibers in forebrain vocal and auditory nuclei of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

    Brain, behavior and evolution·2002
    Same author

    Distribution of iron in the parrot brain: conserved (pallidal) and derived (nigral) labeling patterns.

    Brain research·2001
    Same author

    Ebb and flow: a theory of lasting relationships.

    Harvard review of psychiatry·2001
    Same author

    Projections of the oval nucleus of the hyperstriatum ventrale in the budgerigar: relationships with the auditory system.

    The Journal of comparative neurology·2001
    Same author

    Distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase-containing neurons and fibers in the brain of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): general patterns and labeling in vocal control nuclei.

    The Journal of comparative neurology·2000
    Same journal

    IGFBP3 and UBE2C are associated with protein modification pathways and serve as prognostic markers in glioma.

    Brain research·2026
    Same journal

    Targeting neurodevelopmental miR132-3p promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in mice.

    Brain research·2026
    Same journal

    Variability in acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition across adulthood in Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 knockout mice.

    Brain research·2026
    Same journal

    Transcriptome-guided modeling reveals insulin-related metabolic dysfunction in SCA3 mouse cerebellum.

    Brain research·2026
    Same journal

    Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

    Brain research·2026
    Same journal

    Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

    Brain research·2026
    See all related articles

    Classical conditioning in rats reveals that neural responses in the ventral tegmentum and reticular formation change only if cells initially respond to the conditioned stimulus (CS). Pairing stimuli enhances changes in brain regions where auditory and brain shock fields overlap.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Behavioral Neuroscience
    • Learning and Memory

    Background:

    • Classical conditioning involves associating a conditioned stimulus (CS) with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS).
    • Neural plasticity underlies learning and memory formation during conditioning.
    • Understanding the neural substrates of conditioning is crucial for deciphering learning mechanisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate neural activity changes in the ventral tegmentum and reticular formation during classical conditioning.
    • To identify specific neuronal populations involved in the conditioning process.
    • To explore the interaction between conditioned and unconditioned stimulus representations in the brain.

    Main Methods:

    • Unit activity was recorded from the ventral tegmentum and reticular formation in behaving rats.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Classical conditioning was implemented using an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and medial forebrain bundle electrical stimulation as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS).
  • Neuronal responses to CS and UCS were analyzed before and after conditioning.

    • Main Results:

    • Only neurons that initially responded to the conditioned stimulus (CS) exhibited changes in activity post-conditioning.
    • Neurons responsive to both the auditory CS and brain shock UCS showed significantly more changes than those responding only to the CS.
    • Neural fields of auditory and brain shock stimuli were found to interact in specific brain regions prior to conditioning.

    Conclusions:

    • The interaction of neural fields representing the CS and UCS prior to conditioning is critical for subsequent response modification.
    • Pairing stimuli in regions where their fields overlap is more effective in altering neural responses.
    • The convergence of stimulus representations may be a prerequisite for conditioning, with interaction at the recording site driving the observed changes.