Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conventional or Li vasectomy: a questionnaire study

M Skriver1, F Skovsgaard, J Miskowiak

  • 1Department of Surgery, Sundby Hospital, Denmark.

British Journal of Urology
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Scintigraphic localization of colonic bleeding].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2001
Same author

Transurethral ureterocystostomy.

Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2000
Same author

[Blood loss and irrigation fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1998
Same author

[Circumcision by the method of Lucas].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1998
Same author

[Follow-up of patients after splenectomy at a local hospital].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1998
Same author

Percutaneous sclerotherapy of hydronephrosis in a non-functioning kidney.

Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·1998
Same journal

Removal of ureteric calculus by the ureteric corkscrew in a case of calculous anuria.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

Obstructive anuria, probably due to calculus.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

The incidence of signs of renal injury following prolonged burial under debris in an unselected series of 764 airraid casualties admitted to hospital.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

Contribution to the etiology of acquired fibrosis of the bladder neck.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

True infective abacterial pyuria.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

A malignant right kidney removed at operation, together with a short length of the vena cava.

British journal of urology·2010
See all related articles

The Li no-scalpel vasectomy method resulted in less post-operative pain, fewer infections, and reduced analgesic use compared to the conventional vasectomy technique. This minimally invasive approach offers improved patient recovery and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Vasectomy is a common surgical procedure for male sterilization.
  • Conventional vasectomy involves a scalpel incision, potentially leading to discomfort and complications.
  • The Li no-scalpel technique offers an alternative approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare pain, discomfort, complications, and convalescence between conventional vasectomy and the Li no-scalpel method.
  • To evaluate patient outcomes and satisfaction with both vasectomy techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 256 men undergoing vasectomy at two hospitals.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: conventional vasectomy and Li no-scalpel vasectomy.
  • Pain and discomfort were assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) via questionnaires.
Keywords:
Comparative StudiesDenmarkDeveloped CountriesDiseasesEuropeFamily PlanningInfectionsMale SterilizationNorthern EuropePainResearch MethodologyResearch ReportScandinaviaSigns And SymptomsSterilization, SexualStudiesVasectomy--side effects

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The Li no-scalpel group reported significantly less pain at rest after one week and lower analgesic use.
  • Fewer infections and physician contacts were observed in the Li no-scalpel group.
  • No significant differences were found in pain during surgery, early post-operative pain, bleeding, or cosmetic satisfaction.

Conclusions:

  • The Li no-scalpel vasectomy technique is associated with reduced post-operative pain, decreased need for analgesics, and fewer infections.
  • This method offers advantages in terms of patient recovery and reduces the frequency of post-procedure medical consultations compared to conventional vasectomy.