Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On testing the face validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population

K L Kafer1, M Hunter

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

This study questioned the reliability of common executive function tests in adults. Findings suggest current planning and problem-solving tests may not accurately measure these cognitive abilities.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mortality in a South African metropole (2020 - 2021): A retrospective cohort study.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2026
Same author

Striatal and thalamic automatic segmentation, morphology, and clinical correlates in Parkinsonism: Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy.

Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging·2023
Same author

Relationships between longitudinal changes in body composition and bone mineral density in middle-to-older aged Australians.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2023
Same author

A prospective observational study of the effects of sugammadex on peri-operative oestrogen and progesterone levels in women who take hormonal contraception.

Anaesthesia·2022
Same author

Kidney Transplantation in a Recipient with Positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2.

International journal of organ transplantation medicine·2022
Same author

An imperative to offer pregnant and lactating women access to the COVID-19 vaccination roll-out programme.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2021

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Clinical assessment of executive functions often relies on tests with apparent validity.
  • Reliable measurement of executive functions in clinical populations requires validation in normal populations.
  • The psychometric properties of widely used executive function tests need rigorous evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reliability and psychometric structure of four tests commonly used to assess planning and problem-solving.
  • To evaluate the construct validity of planning/problem-solving using structural equation modeling.
  • To determine if established tests accurately measure the latent construct of planning/problem-solving in healthy adults.

Main Methods:

  • Administered four planning/problem-solving tests (Tower of London Test, Six Element Test, Twenty Questions Test, Rey Complex Figure Test) to 130 healthy adults (ages 17-55).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed structural equation modeling (LISREL 8) to assess three hypothesized models of the planning/problem-solving construct.
  • Examined the relationships among test variables and the latent construct of planning/problem-solving.
  • Main Results:

    • An adequate structural equation model could not be estimated for the planning/problem-solving construct.
    • The study raises significant questions regarding the psychometric structure of the Tower of London Test.
    • The findings challenge the assumed measurement properties of the executive function tests used.

    Conclusions:

    • The reliability and validity of commonly used planning/problem-solving tests are questionable.
    • Further research is needed to develop and validate robust measures of executive functions.
    • Clinical interpretation of results from these tests should be approached with caution due to psychometric limitations.