Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Birth weight, prematurity and accuracy of gestational age
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Objective:
To investigate commonly used birth weight categories in relation to gestational age assignment by menstrual (LMP) or ultrasound dates.
Methods:
A total of 34,249 cases were retrieved from the East Midlands Obstetric Database. Of these, 2281 (6.7%) delivered preterm (< 37 weeks) by ultrasound dating. The percentage of preterm and post-term cases was calculated for birth weight categories from < 1500 g to > 4499 g at 500 g intervals. The incidence of preterm delivery was estimated for birth weights from < 1500 g to 3400 g.
Results:
For the 'low birth weight' cut-off of 2500 g, only 64% were actually preterm as assessed by ultrasound, as opposed to 59% as judged by menstrual dates. Nearly 95% of infants weighing over 3000 g are full-term. For birth weights under 2900 g, there is a trend for LMP-derived gestational age to underestimate preterm delivery, by up to 35.5%. By ultrasound dating, 90% of infants under 1800 g are preterm, rising to 98.2% for those under 1500 g.
Conclusions:
As nearly 40% of 'low birth weight' infants are born at term, the old classification of 'low birth weight' should be replaced by gestational age-specific percentile categories. Menstrual dates systematically underestimate the prevalence of preterm delivery. Previous estimates of preterm delivery rates based on LMP data have under-stated their true incidence.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Precision
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

