Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening for HIV: ratios, risks and rationality

M E Jones1

  • 1School of Medicine , Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microsurgical training pre-and post-COVID 19: Is there a re-learning curve and lessons for lockdown three.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2021
Same author

Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2020
Same author

Challenges in the diagnosis of leptospirosis outwith endemic settings: a Scottish single centre experience.

The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh·2018
Same author

Electron transport and room temperature single-electron charging in 10 nm scale PtC nanostructures formed by electron beam induced deposition.

Nanotechnology·2017
Same author

Maximizing length and safety in gracilis free flap dissection.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2016
Same author

The importance of bone shortening in digital replantation.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2016
Same journal

Evaluating the completeness of perioperative outcome metrics in electronic medical records: Insights based on the proposed Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Registry framework.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2026
Same journal

Large language model prompt engineering for medical education: A practical guide for the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Final Examination.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2026
Same journal

Nitrous oxide added at the end of sevoflurane anaesthesia hastens emergence and eliminates prolonged time to extubation (SEVONATE study): A randomised controlled trial.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2026
Same journal

Complications related to arterial line catheters and monitoring reported to webAIRS, 2009-2023.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2026
Same journal

A summary guide for detecting and reducing nitrous oxide infrastructure leaks in healthcare facilities.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2026
Same journal

Is jelly a solid or a clear liquid? A pilot study using ultrasound to assess the gastric emptying of fruit-flavoured gelatin dessert.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2026
See all related articles

Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in healthcare settings is not cost-effective solely for preventing transmission between patients and staff. The primary benefit of HIV screening lies in its role in controlling the broader community epidemic.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Infectious Disease Epidemiology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) screening is a critical component of public health strategies.
  • Understanding the cost-effectiveness of screening within healthcare settings is essential for resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) screening for patients and healthcare workers.
  • To determine the primary source of benefit for implementing HIV screening programs in healthcare institutions.

Main Methods:

  • Economic modeling to assess cost-effectiveness.
  • Analysis of transmission chains within healthcare institutions and the general population.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • HIV screening is unlikely to be cost-effective when considering only the prevention of transmission between patients and healthcare workers within an institution.
  • The predominant cost-effectiveness of HIV screening is derived from its impact on interrupting transmission within the larger community epidemic.

Conclusions:

  • The rationale for widespread Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) screening should focus on its broader public health impact.
  • Healthcare institutions play a role in controlling community-level HIV transmission through screening initiatives.