Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

p-value adjustments for subgroup analyses

D R Bristol1

  • 1Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey 07033, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|May 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical equivalence.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·1999
Same author

Determining equivalence and the impact of sample size in anti-infective studies: a point to consider.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·1996
Same author

Planning survival studies to compare a treatment to an active control.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·1993
Same author

Sample size determination using an interim analysis.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·1993
Same author

The analysis of failure time data in crossover studies.

Statistics in medicine·1992
Same author

Testing equality of treatment variances in a two-by-two crossover study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·1991

Subgroup analyses in clinical trials help understand treatment effects across patient groups. This study presents an approximate statistical technique to address concerns about false positives in these analyses.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Subgroup analyses are common in clinical trials to assess treatment consistency and identify prognostic factors.
  • Unadjusted p-values in subgroup analyses can lead to misleading false positives, a known statistical concern.
  • Existing conservative adjustment methods often result in a lack of significant findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an approximate statistical technique for subgroup analyses in clinical trials.
  • To provide a method that balances the detection of true effects with the control of false positives.
  • To offer a practical approach for normally distributed variables in clinical trial data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an approximate statistical technique for subgroup analyses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on variables with a normal distribution.
  • Evaluation of the technique's performance in controlling false positives while maintaining power.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed approximate technique offers a viable alternative to unadjusted or overly conservative methods.
    • It aims to improve the reliability of findings from subgroup analyses.
    • Demonstrates potential for identifying significant treatment effects without excessive false positives.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented approximate technique provides a novel statistical approach for clinical trial subgroup analyses.
    • This method is particularly useful for normally distributed variables, enhancing the interpretation of trial results.
    • Further research may explore its application to other data distributions and complex trial designs.