Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Amputation versus limb salvage

P Tornetta1, S A Olson

  • 1Kings County Hospital Center, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, USA.

Instructional Course Lectures
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of coronal plane angulation on patient reported outcome measures of operatively treated distal femur fractures: A multi-center prospective evaluation.

Injury·2024
Same author

Immune cell profiling in the joint following human and murine articular fracture.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2021
Same author

Intra-articular depletion of macrophages increases acute synovitis and alters macrophage polarity in the injured mouse knee.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2020
Same author

Early recovery after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a prospective, observational study.

Journal of hip preservation surgery·2017
Same author

Non-invasive mouse models of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2015
Same author

Sustained intra-articular delivery of IL-1RA from a thermally-responsive elastin-like polypeptide as a therapy for post-traumatic arthritis.

European cells & materials·2015
Same journal

Metastatic Bone Disease With Pathologic or Impending Pathologic Fractures: Resolve, Refer, or Collaborate.

Instructional course lectures·2025
Same journal

Evolving Concepts in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Instructional course lectures·2025
Same journal

Cervical Myelopathy: Where Are We Now? Classification, Surgical Approaches, and Tips and Tricks to Stay Out of Trouble.

Instructional course lectures·2025
Same journal

Factors Affecting Return to Play in Athletes With Foot and Ankle Injuries.

Instructional course lectures·2025
Same journal

Distal Tibia Salter-Harris Fractures: To Fix or Not to Fix.

Instructional course lectures·2025
Same journal

Pediatric and Adolescent Tibial Shaft Fractures: Flexible Nail, Rigid Nail, Plate, or External Fixation.

Instructional course lectures·2025
See all related articles

Deciding between leg salvage and amputation is complex for trauma surgeons. Patient factors, team consultation, and psychological considerations are crucial for optimal outcomes in severe leg injuries.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Trauma Management

Background:

  • Severe leg injuries present complex treatment dilemmas.
  • Orthopaedic surgeons face difficult decisions regarding limb salvage versus amputation.
  • Lack of consensus exists even among experienced trauma surgeons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the multifaceted decision-making process for severe leg injuries.
  • To highlight the importance of multidisciplinary consultation in limb salvage.
  • To discuss the psychological impact of amputation timing on patients and families.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical decision-making in severe leg trauma.
  • Emphasis on multidisciplinary team approach (trauma, vascular, orthopaedic, soft-tissue specialists).
  • Consideration of patient-specific factors and psychological aspects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No single standard course of action exists for all severe leg injuries.
  • Multidisciplinary consultation is essential for successful salvage attempts.
  • Patient factors (pre-injury function, social situation) significantly influence the decision.
  • Psychological impact of amputation timing (immediate vs. delayed) is a critical consideration.
  • Scoring systems offer some guidance but do not replace clinical judgment.

Conclusions:

  • The decision to amputate or attempt salvage is highly individualized.
  • It requires balancing clinical data with patient-specific factors, surgeon experience, and available resources.
  • Open communication with patients and families is imperative throughout the process.