Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose reduction in mammography

R A Mintzer, H J Matthies, P P Lin

    Investigative Radiology
    |September 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Miniature Gamma Cameraa.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2017
    Same author

    [A preliminary study on the outcome of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome by low-dose decitabine].

    Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi·2017
    Same author

    Heterogeneous evolution of Ty3-gypsy retroelements among bamboo species.

    Genetics and molecular research : GMR·2016
    Same author

    Closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous cement augmentation for long bone metastases.

    The bone & joint journal·2016
    Same author

    Complete soft tissue sarcoma resection is a viable treatment option for select elderly patients.

    Annals of surgical oncology·2009
    Same author

    Stoned B mediates sorting of integral synaptic vesicle proteins.

    Neuroscience·2008
    Same journal

    3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging of Optic Nerve Sheath.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity in 115,966 Patients: Risk Factors, Severity Profiles, and the Impact of Iodine Concentration on Reaction Risk.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Improvement of Lung Nodule Volumetric Accuracy with Photon-counting Computed Tomography Over Energy-integrating Computed Tomography in Low-dose Screening: A Phantom Study.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Photon-counting CT in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Improved Metal Artifact Reduction and Impact on Bone Fusion Assessment.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Body Imaging: Technical Basis, Current Applications, and Future Directions.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Digadoglucitol, a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for the Central Nervous System.

    Investigative radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    The Kodak Min-R mammography system offers comparable image detail to Xerox but with 75% lower patient radiation exposure. This allows for improved imaging geometry and superior diagnostic quality in some cases.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Diagnostic Imaging

    Background:

    • Mammography is crucial for breast cancer detection.
    • Evaluating different mammographic imaging systems is essential for optimizing diagnostic quality and patient safety.
    • Xerox and Kodak Min-R systems represent distinct technologies in mammography.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the image quality and patient radiation dose of the Xerox and Kodak Min-R mammographic imaging systems.
    • To assess the diagnostic performance and potential for improved imaging geometry with the Kodak Min-R system.

    Main Methods:

    • A comparative study involving 300 mammographic examinations using both Xerox and Kodak Min-R systems.
    • Image detail was evaluated at identical source-to-image receptor distances (SID).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Patient radiation exposure was measured using thermoluminescent dose meters.

    • Main Results:

    • Both systems demonstrated equivalent image detail at the same SID.
    • The Kodak Min-R system resulted in approximately 25% of the patient exposure compared to the Xerox system.
    • Improved geometric arrangements with the Min-R system yielded superior diagnostic images in 5.5% of 200 comparison cases.

    Conclusions:

    • The Kodak Min-R system provides significant radiation dose reduction compared to Xerox mammography.
    • The system's lower power requirements enable increased SID, potentially enhancing diagnostic image quality.
    • Kodak Min-R represents a safer and potentially more effective mammographic imaging option.