Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making

S E Pitt1, J D Brandt, C Tellefsen

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, USA.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability and validity of surface EMG assessments combined with isometric muscle strength testing in patients with abdominal rectus diastasis and asymptomatic controls.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Erratum.

Journal of periodontology·2018
Same author

Development of health diagnostics based on personalized medical models.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2016
Same author

A comprehensive rehabilitation program for chronic patients in a state mental hospital.

Community mental health journal·2013
Same author

Vascular diseases of the brain.

Bulletin. New England Medical Center Hospital·2010
Same author

The electrocardiogram in neurocirculatory asthenia, anxiety neurosis, or effort syndrome.

American heart journal·2010
Same journal

National Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Exposure to Correctional Psychiatry.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Pregnancy Criminalization in the United States.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Letter.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Managing Violence in State Hospitals with Forensic Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same journal

Plea Bargaining Participation and Competency Evaluation Considerations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
See all related articles

Forensic evaluators showed similar agreement on diagnosis, competency, and criminal responsibility, regardless of whether opinions were shared openly or by secret ballot. This suggests conformity did not significantly impact these forensic assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Legal Psychology

Background:

  • Forensic evaluations are critical for legal proceedings, informing decisions on diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility.
  • The influence of group dynamics and conformity on forensic evaluators' opinions is not fully understood.
  • Previous practices involved open voting, potentially introducing conformity bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the level of agreement among forensic evaluators regarding diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility.
  • To investigate the role of conformity in the decision-making process of forensic evaluators.
  • To compare opinion agreement using secret versus open ballot methods.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study design was employed, matching defendants based on age, race, sex, and offense.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluations from twenty court-ordered pretrial cases (March-June 1991) using secret ballots were compared to a control group using open ballots.
  • Forensic staff conferences involved psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers rendering opinions on diagnosis, competency, and criminal responsibility.

    • Main Results:

    • The study found minimal disparity in forensic opinions between the secret ballot (experimental) group and the open ballot (control) group.
    • Hypotheses predicting greater disagreement with secret ballots were not supported by the data.
    • Agreement levels on diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility were consistently high across both voting methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The method of voting (secret vs. open ballot) did not significantly influence the level of agreement among forensic evaluators.
    • Conformity does not appear to be a major factor affecting consensus in these specific forensic opinion areas.
    • Findings suggest a robust agreement among multidisciplinary forensic teams regardless of the voting procedure.