Related Experiment Videos
Comprehending compounds: evidence for metaphoric skill?
1Department of Psychology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041, USA.
Journal of Child Language
|February 1, 1997
Summary
Three-year-olds can understand shape-based metaphoric compounds like "stick-bug," even with distractions. However, they struggle with color-based compounds, showing developing comprehension skills in children's language acquisition.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Linguistics
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Children's understanding of compound nouns is crucial for language development.
- Previous research indicates three-year-olds can interpret compounds with salient distractors.
- Metaphoric compounds, where one noun denotes similarity to another object (e.g., catfish), present unique comprehension challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate children's comprehension of metaphoric noun-noun compounds.
- To examine the role of visual resemblance (shape vs. color/pattern) in understanding these compounds.
- To assess developmental differences in metaphoric compound comprehension from age three to adulthood.
Main Methods:
- Four studies were conducted involving 44 three-year-olds, 45 five-year-olds, and 22 adults.
- Participants identified referents of metaphoric compounds presented in picture arrays.
- Arrays included targets with shape-based (e.g., stick-bug) or color/pattern-based (e.g., zebra-shells) resemblances, alongside distractors.
Main Results:
- Both three- and five-year-olds successfully comprehended shape-based metaphoric compounds, even with distractors.
- Younger children (three-year-olds) exhibited difficulties with color/pattern-based metaphoric compounds.
- Five-year-olds outperformed three-year-olds, but both groups performed significantly below adults.
Conclusions:
- Children as young as three can understand shape-based metaphoric compounds, indicating early metaphorical reasoning.
- Comprehension of color/pattern-based metaphoric compounds develops later than shape-based ones.
- Children do not universally interpret compounds literally, demonstrating an emerging ability to grasp non-literal meanings.