Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Femoral Arterial and Venous Catheterization for Blood Sampling, Drug Administration and Conscious Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Measurements
Published on: January 24, 2012
Diagnosis of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis
Y Siegman-Igra1, A M Anglim, D E Shapiro
1Infectious Disease Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Abstract:
Catheter-related bloodstream infections increased in incidence during the past decade, causing significant morbidity, mortality, and excess hospital costs. Absence of inflammation at the catheter site in most cases makes clinical diagnosis uncertain. The relative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different microbiologic tests for confirming that bloodstream infection is catheter related have remained unclear. A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted regarding the accuracy of diagnostic test methods using pooled sensitivity and specificity and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The cost for each test was estimated by methods published by the College of American Pathologists. Costs of catheter replacement and antibiotic therapy for false positive results were included in the cost per accurate test result. Twenty-two studies evaluating six test methods met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Accuracy increased in ROC analysis for catheter segment cultures with increasing quantitation (P = 0.03) (i.e., quantitative > semiquantitative > qualitative) largely due to an increase in specificity. The highest Youden index (mean = 0.85) was observed with quantitative catheter segment culture, the only method with pooled sensitivity and specificity above 90%. For blood culture methods, there was no statistically significant trend toward increased accuracy. The unpaired quantitative catheter blood culture offered the lowest cost per accurate test result but was only 78% sensitive. In conclusion, quantitative culture was the most accurate method for catheter segment culture, and unpaired quantitative catheter blood culture was the single most cost-effective test, especially for long-term catheters.
Insights
Quantitative culture of catheter segments is the most accurate method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Unpaired quantitative catheter blood culture offers the best cost-effectiveness, particularly for long-term catheters.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Diagnostics
- Health Economics
Background:
- Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) present a growing clinical challenge, marked by increased incidence, significant patient morbidity and mortality, and substantial healthcare costs.
- Accurate diagnosis of CRBSIs is often difficult due to the frequent absence of localized inflammation at the catheter insertion site.
- The comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of various microbiological tests for diagnosing CRBSIs remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different microbiological tests for identifying catheter-related bloodstream infections.
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of these diagnostic methods, incorporating costs associated with false positives and treatment.
- To identify the most accurate and cost-effective diagnostic strategy for CRBSIs.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was performed on 22 studies encompassing six different diagnostic test methods for CRBSIs.
- Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
- Test costs were estimated using College of American Pathologists guidelines, including costs for catheter replacement and antibiotic therapy for false positives.
Main Results:
- Quantitative catheter segment cultures demonstrated increasing accuracy with higher levels of quantitation (quantitative > semiquantitative > qualitative), primarily due to enhanced specificity.
- Quantitative catheter segment culture achieved the highest Youden index (0.85) and was the sole method with pooled sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%.
- Unpaired quantitative catheter blood culture was the most cost-effective test, despite having a sensitivity of only 78%.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative culture of catheter segments is the most accurate microbiological method for diagnosing CRBSIs.
- Unpaired quantitative catheter blood culture represents the most cost-effective diagnostic test, particularly for patients with long-term indwelling catheters.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

