Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of two phonological profiles: a tutorial

M J Ball¹, N Müller

¹School of Behavioural and Communication Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland.

Journal of Communication Disorders

|May 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adhesion of Escherichia coli under flow conditions reveals potential novel effects of FimH mutations.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·2016

Same author

Leveraging IT to Improve Patient Safety.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016

Same author

A New IMIA Tradition.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016

Same author

Next Generation - Health Professional Workstations.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016

Same author

Preface.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016

Same author

Reflections on the Yearbook from the 1990's to the Present.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016

Same journal

State of the art in speech perception assessment.

Journal of communication disorders·2026

Same journal

Clinicians' perspectives and experiences on using consistent terminology in speech-language pathology: A qualitative study.

Journal of communication disorders·2026

Same journal

Divergent Cognitive-Linguistic Mechanisms in Mandarin Sentence Recognition: The Impact of F0 Contour and Noise in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Journal of communication disorders·2026

Same journal

Speech-language service utilization by families with young children: The role of social determinants of health.

Journal of communication disorders·2026

Same journal

Effectiveness and stability of differential interventions in mitigating negative attitudes of Indian university students toward stuttering.

Journal of communication disorders·2026

Same journal

Expressive language growth among young children who do and do not stutter.

Journal of communication disorders·2026

See all related articles

This tutorial explores linguistic profiles as an alternative to standardized tests for speech and language disorders. It details two phonological disorder profiles, guiding readers on their application and evaluating their effectiveness.

Area of Science:

Speech and Language Pathology
Linguistics
Clinical Linguistics

Background:

Standardized testing for speech and language disorders presents limitations.
Alternative assessment methods are needed to capture individual linguistic nuances.
The concept of a 'linguistic profile' offers a potential solution.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and discuss the concept of linguistic profiles as an alternative to standardized testing.
To provide practical examples of linguistic profiles for disordered phonology.
To guide clinicians in the application and assessment of these profiles.

Main Methods:

Descriptive approach outlining the theoretical basis of linguistic profiling.
Illustrative case examples of linguistic profiles for phonological disorders.

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of different profiling methods.

Main Results:

Linguistic profiles can offer a more individualized assessment of speech and language disorders.
Specific examples demonstrate the utility of profiling in phonological assessment.
The tutorial provides a framework for understanding the application and evaluation of these profiles.

Conclusions:

Linguistic profiling represents a valuable alternative or supplement to standardized testing.
Clinicians can benefit from utilizing detailed linguistic profiles for diagnosis and treatment planning.
Further research into the efficacy and standardization of linguistic profiles is warranted.