Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Technical considerations in powered instrumentation

D G Becker1

  • 1Division of Rhinology and Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Aesthetic implications of surgical anatomy in blepharoplasty.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

The radix graft in cosmetic rhinoplasty.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Risk of early renal allograft failure is increased for patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·2000
Same author

Treating the caudal septal deflection.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2000
Same journal

Current State of Button Battery Ingestion Injuries.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Algorithm for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Indications for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revisiting Eustachian Tube Anatomy and Physiology.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Glottic Stenosis.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Eustachian Tube Disorders in Children.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

This review covers engineering principles for soft-tissue shavers and bone-cutting drills. Understanding these technical aspects helps surgeons optimize instrument precision and performance in various surgical applications.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Powered surgical instruments, including soft-tissue shavers and bone-cutting drills, are crucial in modern surgical procedures.
  • Their application extends beyond traditional uses, encompassing areas like submental lipectomy and nasal dorsum modification.
  • Optimizing instrument performance is key to achieving desired surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the technical engineering aspects of soft-tissue shavers and bone-cutting drills.
  • To enhance surgeon understanding of instrument principles for improved control over aggressiveness and precision.
  • To discuss design modifications of powered instrumentation for diverse surgical scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Review of technical engineering principles related to soft-tissue shavers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of engineering aspects of bone-cutting drills.
  • Discussion of design changes and their impact on surgical applications.
  • Main Results:

    • Improved understanding of engineering principles allows for better control of instrument aggressiveness and precision.
    • Powered instrumentation is versatile, with applications in soft-tissue procedures (e.g., submental lipectomy) and bone modification (e.g., nasal dorsum).
    • Specific drill design modifications can address challenges in various surgical situations.

    Conclusions:

    • A deeper grasp of the engineering behind surgical instruments empowers surgeons to refine their technique.
    • The adaptability of powered instrumentation highlights the need for continued innovation in device design.
    • Further research into instrument engineering can lead to enhanced surgical precision and patient outcomes.