Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using systematic reviews in clinical education

R G Badgett1, M O'Keefe, M C Henderson

  • 1University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.

Annals of Internal Medicine
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hospital clinical research activity, rather than staff motivational engagement, significantly links effective staff communication and favourable patient feedback; a cross-sectional study.

Journal of healthcare quality research·2021
Same author

Impulsivity and self-control in elementary school children and adult females: Using identical task and procedural parameters.

Behavioural processes·2021
Same author

Relationship between staff thriving, through engagement and research activity, and hospital-related outcome measures: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Journal of healthcare quality research·2021
Same author

Hospital Workforce Engagement and Inpatient Mortality Rate: Findings from the English National Health Service Staff Surveys.

Journal of general internal medicine·2020
Same author

Machine Learning Algorithm Helps Identify Non-Diagnosed Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Patients in the General Population.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2019
Same author

Optimizing intersectoral collaboration between health and education: the Health Bridges study.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2017

Systematic reviews enhance medical education by connecting clinical questions to research evidence. Integrating them into journal clubs improves critical appraisal skills and information use for better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Information Science

Background:

  • Traditional medical education methods struggle to change clinical practice effectively.
  • Teaching critical appraisal via journal clubs does not increase trainees' medical research engagement.
  • Experiential learning theory suggests linking education to clinical questions generated during patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the utility of systematic reviews as a powerful educational mechanism in clinical settings.
  • To propose integrating systematic reviews into medical training to address clinical questions.
  • To enhance the rational and effective use of medical information by healthcare professionals.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraging systematic reviews to connect clinical questions with research findings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing "teachable moments" during patient care for educational interventions.
  • Employing existing journal clubs to teach about systematic reviews' strengths and limitations.

    • Main Results:

    • Systematic reviews can effectively link clinical questions to difficult-to-access research.
    • They offer a unique opportunity to model rational information use for trainees.
    • Availability at clinical sites facilitates timely learning and application.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic reviews are a powerful tool for medical education, bridging the gap between clinical practice and research.
    • Integrating systematic reviews into clinical settings, particularly during "teachable moments," can improve learning.
    • Teaching emphasizes that systematic reviews support, rather than replace, clinical decision-making.