Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiation exposure during standard and complex interventional procedures

T Vehmas1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

The British Journal of Radiology
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adipokine genes and radiographic hand osteoarthritis in Finnish women: a cross-sectional study.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2017
Same author

Association between overweight and dip osteoarthritis among middle-aged Finnish female dentists and teachers.

Obesity research & clinical practice·2013
Same author

Lung and pleural fibrosis in asbestos-exposed workers: a risk factor for pneumonia mortality.

Epidemiology and infection·2012
Same author

Genetic susceptibility to asbestos-related fibrotic pleuropulmonary changes.

The European respiratory journal·2010
Same author

Hand osteoarthritis and pinch grip strength among middle-aged female dentists and teachers.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2010
Same author

Radiology in the gross health context: need for prevention?

Clinical radiology·2009
Same journal

Radioligand therapy for paediatric patients with solid tumours.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Vertebral computed tomography attenuation to case-find low bone density in people undergoing lung cancer screening.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Complex interventional procedures involve higher radiation exposure for radiologists than standard procedures. This highlights the need for updated radiation safety protocols in interventional radiology.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Radiology
  • Radiation Safety
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Standard interventional procedures have established radiation dose metrics.
  • Data on radiation exposure during complex interventional procedures is limited.
  • Complex procedures, including combined and failed interventions, are common in practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare radiation doses received by radiologists during standard versus complex percutaneous drainage procedures.
  • To quantify differences in screening time and radiation dose to extremities (fingers) and head (forehead).
  • To address the lack of data on radiation exposure in complex interventional radiology cases.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection during 28 standard and 10 complex percutaneous drainages.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurement of screening times, dose-area products, and radiologists' forehead and finger doses.
  • Statistical comparison of radiation metrics between standard and complex procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Complex procedures had significantly longer median screening times (20.5 min vs. 8.75 min) and higher median finger doses (163 microGy vs. 84 microGy) compared to standard procedures.
    • Dose-area products and forehead doses were also higher in complex procedures, though not statistically significant.
    • The findings indicate a higher radiation burden for interventional radiologists during complex interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • Complex interventional procedures are associated with significantly higher radiation exposure for radiologists compared to standard procedures.
    • Existing radiation measurement studies may underestimate total exposure due to a lack of data on complex interventions.
    • These findings underscore the importance of considering procedure complexity in radiation protection strategies for interventional radiologists.