Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
Decision-making laboratory computer systems as essential tools for achievement of total quality
1Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190, USA. KBLICK@REV.UOKHSC.EDU
Laboratory quality issues stem from nonanalytical processes, not just analysis. An expert computer system can now manage unpredictable data events, reducing manual workarounds and enhancing overall quality assurance in laboratory testing.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Laboratory Science
- Health Informatics
- Quality Management Systems
Background:
- Significant laboratory errors (nearly 95%) originate from nonanalytical phases (front and back ends) of the testing process.
- Existing laboratory computer systems primarily manage predictable data, leaving infrequent, unpredictable events to manual intervention.
- Manual systems, or 'workarounds,' are prone to inconsistent handling due to their sporadic and unpredictable nature.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce an expert laboratory computer system designed to manage both predictable and unpredictable data events.
- To eliminate the need for manual workarounds in laboratory testing processes.
- To provide a real-time solution for quality assurance throughout the entire laboratory testing workflow.
Main Methods:
- Development of an expert laboratory computer system integrated with a dynamic database.
- Real-time detection and predictable handling of diverse data events.
- Automation of up to 31 distinct tasks previously managed by human workarounds.
Main Results:
- The expert system effectively handles both predictable and unpredictable data events, mitigating the need for manual workarounds.
- Real-time data event detection and predictable management are achieved through the dynamic database integration.
- The system provides a comprehensive tool for addressing quality assurance challenges across the laboratory testing process.
Conclusions:
- Expert computer systems offer a robust solution to mitigate nonanalytical errors in laboratory testing.
- Automating the handling of unpredictable data events significantly improves laboratory quality assurance.
- This approach enhances efficiency and reliability by replacing manual workarounds with predictable, system-driven actions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance
Statgraphics
Introduction to Statistical Process Control

