Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processor quality assurance using digital imaging

A D Goren1, S M Dunn, P F Van der Stelt

  • 1State University, Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine, USA.

The New York State Dental Journal
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived usefulness and ease of use of fundoscopy by medical students: a randomised crossover trial of six technologies (eFOCUS 1).

BMC medical education·2021
Same author

From pixel to image analysis.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2020
Same author

<sup>177</sup>Lu radiolabeling and preclinical theranostic study of 1C1m-Fc: an anti-TEM-1 scFv-Fc fusion protein in soft tissue sarcoma.

EJNMMI research·2020
Same author

[Not Available].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2016
Same author

[Panoramic radiographs in dental diagnostics].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2016
Same author

[Cone beam computed tomography: is more also better?].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2016

Computer imaging can assess processor variability in medical imaging. Automatic film processing showed significant changes over 14 days, potentially leading to misinterpretations in longitudinal studies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Radiology
  • Image processing

Background:

  • Longitudinal studies require consistent image quality.
  • Automatic film processors can exhibit variability.
  • Inconsistent processing may affect diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a computer imaging method for assessing longitudinal processor variability.
  • To quantify deviations in automatic film processing.
  • To evaluate the impact of processor variability on image analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptive histogram equalization technique was employed.
  • Test films were compared against a time-temperature processed standard.
  • Variability was assessed at two kilovoltage peak (kVp) settings and film speeds.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Standard film density ranges remained stable over 14 days.
  • Automatically processed film density ranges varied by a factor of two.
  • Significant processor-induced variability was detected in automatic processing.

Conclusions:

  • Automatic film processing introduces significant variability unsuitable for longitudinal studies.
  • Processor variation can lead to erroneous conclusions regarding bone density changes.
  • Computer imaging methods are crucial for monitoring and ensuring image consistency in medical diagnostics.