Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital image processing

M Prokop1, C M Schaefer-Prokop

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology I, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.

European Radiology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Digital image processing enhances radiograph quality by optimizing parameters like contrast and noise. However, unsharp mask filtering (UMF) can suppress pathology, leading to the development of improved techniques.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[<sup>68</sup>Ga]FAPI PET/CT reveals increased pulmonary fibroblast activation protein expression in long COVID patients after ICU discharge.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2025
Same author

Optimal approach to performing and reporting computed tomography angiography for suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a clinical consensus statement of the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation & Right Ventricular Function, the Fleischner Society, the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC, endorsed by European Respiratory Society (ERS), Asian Society of Thoracic Radiology (ASTR), European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI), and Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR).

European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging·2025
Same author

The ULS23 challenge: A baseline model and benchmark dataset for 3D universal lesion segmentation in computed tomography.

Medical image analysis·2025
Same author

Routine contrast-enhanced CT is insufficient for TNM-staging of duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2022
Same author

The impact and challenges of implementing CTCA according to the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes: a survey and projection of CTCA services in the Netherlands.

Insights into imaging·2021
Same author

Non-traumatic complications of a solitary rib osteochondroma; an unusual cause of hemoptysis and pneumothorax.

BJR case reports·2020
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Temporal bone remodeling after venous stenting for pulsatile tinnitus: isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Do hepatic and biliary functional data from gadoxetate-enhanced MRI add value in predicting outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)?

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular risk factors and carotid plaque components in a multi-ethnic cohort using 3 Tesla MRI: the HELIUS study.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Digital Image Processing
  • Radiography

Background:

  • Radiograph image quality depends on local contrast, spatial resolution, latitude, and noise.
  • Digital processing aims to enhance pathology visualization by optimizing these parameters.
  • Correct processing balances contrast and latitude for a conventional appearance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of digital processing techniques in improving radiograph image quality.
  • To address the limitations of unsharp mask filtering (UMF) in medical imaging.
  • To explore methods for overcoming UMF-induced suppression of pathology and artifacts.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of image quality parameters: local contrast, spatial resolution, latitude, and image noise.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of digital processing techniques, including unsharp mask filtering (UMF).
  • Review of manufacturer-developed approaches to mitigate UMF drawbacks.

    • Main Results:

    • Unsharp mask filtering (UMF) can improve image quality but may suppress pathologic lesions or create artifacts.
    • Optimizing processing parameters is crucial to balance contrast and latitude.
    • Manufacturers have introduced alternative methods to address UMF limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital processing is essential for optimizing radiograph quality and pathology detection.
    • Unsharp mask filtering presents challenges that require careful management or alternative solutions.
    • Ongoing development aims to enhance diagnostic accuracy through advanced image processing.