Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators
H M Connolly1, J K Oh, T A Orszulak
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Insights
Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis is feasible in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Outcomes are acceptable, with most patients experiencing symptom and ejection fraction improvement, though survival is linked to coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction poses increased risks for valve replacement.
- Limited data exist on outcomes for AS patients with LV systolic dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of aortic valve replacement in patients with AS and LV systolic dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- 154 patients with LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%) underwent aortic valve replacement for AS between 1985-1992.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 51% of patients.
- Follow-up data were analyzed for mortality, survival rates, and changes in ejection fraction.
Main Results:
- Perioperative mortality was 9%.
- Coronary artery disease and reduced preoperative cardiac output were significant predictors of reduced survival.
- 88% of patients improved symptomatically (NYHA class III/IV pre-op to 7% post-op).
- 76% of survivors showed improved ejection fraction post-surgery.
Conclusions:
- Aortic valve replacement for AS is acceptable in patients with LV dysfunction.
- Outcomes are influenced by coronary artery disease and mean aortic gradient.
- Long-term survival is associated with coronary artery disease and cardiac output.
- Most patients experience significant improvement in symptoms and ejection fraction.
Background:
Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (AS) carries an increased risk in the presence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Few data are available on the outcome of such patients.
Methods And Results:
Between 1985 and 1992, 154 consecutive patients (107 men and 47 women) with LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] < or = 35%) underwent aortic valve replacement for AS. The mean preoperative characteristics included EF, 27 +/- 6%; aortic valve mean gradient, 44 +/- 18 mm Hg; aortic valve area, 0.6 +/- 0.2 cm2; and cardiac output, 4.1 +/- 1.5 L/min. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 78 patients (51%). Perioperative (30-day) mortality was 9% (14 of 154 patients). Fifty patients died during follow-up. Coronary artery disease (P = .002) and a reduced preoperative cardiac output (P = .03) were significantly related to reduced overall survival rate by multivariate analysis. Postoperative improvement occurred in most patients; 88% were New York Heart Association class III or IV before surgery versus 7% after surgery. Postoperative EF was assessed in 76% of survivors; 76% of these demonstrated improvement. By multivariate analysis, change in EF was inversely related to coronary disease (P = .002) and preoperative aortic valve area (P = .03).
Conclusions:
Despite LV dysfunction, the risk of aortic valve replacement for AS was acceptable and related to coronary artery disease and mean aortic gradient, and long-term survival was related to coronary disease and cardiac output. Improvement in symptoms and EF occurred in most patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

