Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two forms of sequential implicit learning

C A Seger1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, California 94350, USA. seger@psych.stanford.edu

Consciousness and Cognition
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals two distinct types of implicit learning: one tied to motor skills and another to cognitive judgments. These learning forms operate independently, suggesting modularity in human cognition.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right-hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships.

Neuropsychology·2000
Same author

Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI.

Neuropsychologia·2000
Same author

Verb generation priming involves conceptual implicit memory.

Brain and cognition·1999
Same author

Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill.

Neuropsychology·1999
Same author

Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning.

Consciousness and cognition·1998
Same author

Preserved verb generation priming in global amnesia.

Neuropsychologia·1997

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Implicit learning, the acquisition of knowledge without conscious awareness, is crucial for skill development.
  • Previous research suggests implicit learning may involve distinct neural and cognitive systems.
  • The serial reaction time (SRT) task is a common paradigm for studying implicit learning, particularly motor-based learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether implicit learning is modular, with distinct systems for motor processing and cognitive judgments.
  • To test the hypothesis of two independent forms of implicit learning using a serial reaction time (SRT) paradigm.
  • To examine the relationship between implicit learning, explicit knowledge, and task structure.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in serial reaction time (SRT) tasks, dual-task SRT, or observation across varying blocks (2, 6, 12).
  • Five sequences with identical underlying structures were used, varying only in surface features.
  • Post-task assessments included SRT (motor-linked), pattern judgment (cognitive-linked), generation, and explicit knowledge tests.

Main Results:

  • A double dissociation was observed between sequence surface structure effects on SRT and pattern judgment.
  • Competence in SRT and pattern judgment developed independently, irrespective of the length of the acquisition task.
  • Performance on both implicit tasks was not influenced by the level of explicit knowledge.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide strong evidence for two independent forms of implicit learning: one associated with motor control and another with cognitive judgments.
  • These results support the modularity of memory and cognitive systems, indicating specialized processing for different types of implicit information.
  • The dissociation highlights the distinct nature of motor and cognitive implicit learning, independent of conscious awareness and explicit knowledge.

Related Experiment Videos