Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A reader's guide to surgical decision analysis

J D Birkmeyer1, H G Welch

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt 05001, USA.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Progress and challenges in improving surgical outcomes.

The British journal of surgery·2012
Same author

Case mix, quality and high-cost kidney transplant patients.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2009
Same author

The effects of donor and recipient practices on transplant center finances.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2008
Same author

Decision analysis for small, asymptomatic intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Neurosurgical focus·2006
Same author

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

Surgical endoscopy·2003

Decision analysis is a structured method for surgical decisions. Surgeons should critically evaluate its components, including models, probabilities, and outcomes, for reliable clinical policy recommendations.

Area of Science:

  • Decision analysis in medicine
  • Surgical decision-making

Background:

  • Decision analysis is increasingly prevalent in surgical literature.
  • Readers and reviewers may lack familiarity with this quantitative technique.
  • This review provides guidance for interpreting decision analysis studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the methodology of decision analysis.
  • To provide guidance on critically interpreting decision analysis in surgery.
  • To enhance surgeon understanding and application of decision analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review article synthesizing decision analysis principles.
  • Examination of core components: decision model, probabilities, utilities, and analysis.
  • Focus on critical interpretation of each component's validity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Decision analysis systematically structures decisions using probabilities and outcome values.
  • Key components include the model, outcome probabilities, utilities (e.g., quality-adjusted life expectancy), and sensitivity analysis.
  • Critical interpretation requires assessing model validity, probability estimates, utility calculations, and sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Surgeons need to critically evaluate decision analysis techniques.
  • As decision analysis influences surgical policy, a deeper understanding is crucial.
  • Improved interpretation skills will lead to more informed clinical decisions.