Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for comparing the performance of different gamma cameras

P N Goodwin, E Himelstein

    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    |October 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Methodologies for the measurement of bone density and their precision and accuracy.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·1987
    Same author

    SPECT instrumentation: performance, lesion detection, and recent innovations.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·1987
    Same author

    A dual collimator design for beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac performance with an Anger camera.

    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1982
    Same author

    Thyroid uptake measurements with I-123: problems and pitfalls: concise communication.

    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1982
    Same author

    Recent developments in instrumentation for emission computed tomography.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·1980
    Same author

    Comparative study of superficial whole-body radiotherapeutic techniques using a 4-MeV nonangulated electron beam.

    Radiology·1977
    Same journal

    Letter from the Editors.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Expanding Horizons: The Role of Kaleidoscope and Relevant Images in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The diagnostic performance and clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in pleural mesothelioma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Feasibility of treating neuroendocrine prostate cancer with anti-SSTR radioligands: A systematic review of imaging and treatment studies.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    <sup>18</sup>F-FDG -PET/CT in cardiac sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and future directions.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Maximizing diagnostic yield: A systematic review and deep dive into PSMA PET scan protocol variations for prostate cancer.

    Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Comparing gamma cameras requires detailed numerical data on performance metrics like resolution and sensitivity. However, modern camera usage conditions significantly impact performance more than inherent manufacturer differences.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Nuclear Medicine
    • Instrumentation

    Background:

    • Gamma cameras are crucial for nuclear medicine imaging.
    • Objective performance comparisons are essential for selecting optimal equipment.
    • Standardized metrics are needed to evaluate gamma camera capabilities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline the key parameters for comparing gamma camera performance.
    • To detail methodologies for accurately measuring these parameters.
    • To assess the relative importance of inherent camera capabilities versus usage conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • Characterizing gamma cameras using numerical data for resolution, contrast, sensitivity, uniformity, dead time, and maximum counting rate.
    • Measuring resolution via line spread function and modulation transfer function.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluating sensitivity, dead time, and maximum counting rate under identical conditions, with and without collimators.

    • Main Results:

    • Resolution is determined using line spread functions and modulation transfer functions.
    • Sensitivity, dead time, and maximum counting rates require controlled conditions for accurate comparison.
    • Intrinsic dead time measurements should exclude collimators, while counting losses require them.

    Conclusions:

    • Modern gamma cameras exhibit high resolution and speed.
    • The conditions of use significantly influence gamma camera performance.
    • Differences in inherent capabilities between manufacturers are less critical than usage context.