Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Trust and physician-assisted suicide

J Liaschenko1

  • 1School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin, Mitwaukee, USA.

Home Care Provider
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing physician-assisted suicide (PAS) bans in Oregon, New York, and Washington. This legal challenge questions existing prohibitions on end-of-life medical assistance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Critique of the "tragic case" method in ethics education.

Journal of medical ethics·2006
Same authorSame journal

Ethical issues in management.

Home care provider·2002
Same author

Home care, novels, and the future.

Home care provider·2001
Same author

Can justice coexist with the supremacy of personal values in nursing practice?

Western journal of nursing research·2001
Same author

2001 and thoughts on technology.

Home care provider·2001
Same author

The moral geography of care work.

Home care provider·2000

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Legal Medicine
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a contentious issue with varying legal statuses across U.S. states.
  • Existing state-level prohibitions on PAS are facing significant legal challenges.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's involvement signifies a critical juncture in the national debate on end-of-life options.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the legal arguments presented in the U.S. Supreme Court case challenging PAS prohibitions.
  • To examine the constitutional and ethical implications of state-level bans on physician-assisted suicide.
  • To understand the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision on end-of-life care legislation nationwide.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal briefs and oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Analysis of existing state statutes in Oregon, New York, and Washington prohibiting physician-assisted suicide.
  • Examination of relevant case law and ethical frameworks concerning patient autonomy and medical intervention.

Main Results:

  • The Supreme Court heard arguments challenging PAS bans in key states.
  • Legal and ethical arguments concerning patient rights and state authority were central to the proceedings.
  • The outcome could reshape the legal landscape of end-of-life medical assistance in the U.S.

Conclusions:

  • The Supreme Court's deliberation on PAS prohibitions marks a pivotal moment for medical ethics and patient rights.
  • The decision may lead to significant changes in legislation governing physician-assisted suicide across the United States.
  • Further legal and public discourse on end-of-life care is anticipated following the Court's ruling.

Related Experiment Videos