Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical quality measurement. Comparing chart review and automated methodologies

M V Dresser1, L Feingold, S L Rosenkranz

  • 1Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc., Brookline, MA, USA.

Medical Care
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Automated data can help measure clinical quality, but chart reviews are often better. Combining both methods, like the hybrid approach, offers the most reliable results for managed care plans.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Ex Vivo</i> Urinary Bactericidal Activity and Urinary Pharmacodynamics of Fosfomycin after Two Repeated Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Subjects.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2019
Same author

Relationship between vancomycin exposure and outcomes among patients with MRSA bloodstream infections with vancomycin Etest® MIC values of 1.5mg/L: A pilot study.

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease·2017
Same author

Clinical pharmacology quality assurance for HIV and related infectious diseases research.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2013
Same author

The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction.

Patient education and counseling·2000
Same author

The HEDIS antidepressant measure.

Behavioral healthcare tomorrow·1999
Same author

Competition on quality in managed care.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·1998

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Informatics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Managed care organizations increasingly use automated data systems for operational efficiency.
  • Accurate clinical quality measurement is crucial for evaluating healthcare performance and patient outcomes.
  • Existing methods for clinical quality indicators rely on diverse data sources with varying reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of automated data systems for generating clinical quality indicators.
  • To compare the accuracy of automated data analysis with traditional chart review methods.
  • To assess the reliability of different automated data sources within a managed care setting.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) 2.0 measures for comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared chart review methodology against automated analysis techniques.
  • Assessed the contribution of various automated data systems (e.g., computerized patient records, claims, encounters).

    • Main Results:

    • Chart review data generally yield superior clinical quality indicators.
    • High levels of agreement were observed between chart review and automated methodologies.
    • Computerized patient record systems demonstrated the highest reliability among automated sources, while automated claims were least reliable.
    • Automated encounter systems showed potential for relatively reliable data.

    Conclusions:

    • Automated data alone is insufficient for comprehensive clinical quality measurement in managed care.
    • Combined methodologies, such as the hybrid approach integrating automated and chart-review data, enhance measurement accuracy.
    • Strategic integration of data sources is recommended for robust quality assessment.