Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Factors affecting socket fixation after cemented revision

V V Raut1, P Kay, P D Siney

  • 1Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

International Orthopaedics
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The risk of cardiac failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2018
Same author

A 28-year clinical and radiological follow-up of alumina ceramic-on-crosslinked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up report and analysis of the oxidation of a shelf-aged acetabular component.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

Contamination of the visors of total body exhaust suits in total hip replacement surgery.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

Impact of anti-inflammatories, beta-blockers and antibiotics on leaf litter breakdown in freshwaters.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2015
Same author

Fate of the unrevised cemented stem following cup only revision: 227 hips at an average of 6 years follow-up.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2015
Same author

Microseparation, fluid pressure and flow in failures of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties.

Bone & joint research·2013
Same journal

Patterns of blood cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, predictors of elevated levels, and associations with clinical symptoms.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Oncological outcomes and clinical efficacy of uniportal endoscopic technique in the treatment of benign bone tumours and tumour-like lesions adjacent to limb joints: a retrospective study.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Time neutrality and reduced ecological burden - handheld robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves operating room efficiency compared with manual total knee arthroplasty.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Shifting paradigms: how the glenoid track changed the concept of shoulder instability.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

The neurogenic elbow disharmony loop: a pathophysiologic model for chronic elbow pain supported by one hundred and fifty seven radial tunnel decompressions.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Post-operative quality of life in patients with necrotizing fasciitis: a report from a ten year institutional cohort.

International orthopaedics·2026
See all related articles

Radiographic outcomes of revised cemented sockets depend on acetabular bone stock and floor preparation. Younger patients face higher revision failure risks, highlighting key factors for successful hip arthroplasty outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Revised cemented sockets in hip arthroplasty present complex challenges.
  • Understanding factors influencing long-term radiographic success is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate key factors affecting the radiographic outcome of revised cemented acetabular components.
  • To identify predictors of failure in revision hip arthroplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 360 cases of revised cemented sockets, with a focus on 70 cases exhibiting radiological signs of failure.
  • Evaluation of acetabular bone stock, acetabular floor preparation, cement mantle thickness, patient age, and use of specific surgical aids.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Acetabular bone stock at revision and acetabular floor preparation were significant predictors of radiographic outcome.
  • Cement mantle thickness also influenced results, while younger patients demonstrated a higher risk of failure.
  • Use of flanged sockets and cement pressurizers showed a trend towards improved results, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Acetabular bone quality and surgical technique during floor preparation are critical for successful revision of cemented sockets.
  • Patient age is a significant risk factor for failure, necessitating careful consideration in younger individuals.
  • Further research may clarify the role of specific implants and instrumentation in optimizing outcomes.