Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Discrete versus cumulative dosing in dose-response discrimination studies

M D Schechter1

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown 44272, USA.

European Journal of Pharmacology
|May 20, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Comparing drug discrimination methods, this study found that cumulative dosing and discrete injections yield similar results. Both quantal and quantitative measurements accurately compare drug effects, validating diverse techniques in pharmacology research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continued trends in the conditioned place preference literature from 1992 to 1996, inclusive, with a cross-indexed bibliography.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·1998
Same author

'Candyflipping': synergistic discriminative effect of LSD and MDMA.

European journal of pharmacology·1998
Same author

Olanzapine attenuates the reinforcing effects of cocaine.

European journal of pharmacology·1998
Same author

MDMA-like stimulus effects of hallucinogens in male Fawn-Hooded rats.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·1998
Same author

Rohypnol ("roofies") control of drug discrimination: effect of coadministered ethanol or flumenazil.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·1998
Same author

LSD produces conditioned place preference in male but not female fawn hooded rats.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·1998

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Drug discrimination assays are crucial for understanding psychoactive substance effects.
  • Standardization of measurement techniques and dosing regimens is essential for reliable data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare quantal versus quantitative measurement techniques in drug discrimination.
  • To evaluate discrete single injections versus cumulative dosing regimens.
  • To assess the comparability of drug discrimination data across different methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • Rats were trained to discriminate between cocaine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA).
  • Two measurement techniques (quantal and quantitative) and two dosing regimens (discrete and cumulative) were employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Dose-response curves and ED50 values were analyzed for significant differences.

    • Main Results:

    • Cumulative and discrete dosing regimens produced comparable dose-response curves and ED50 values.
    • Quantal and quantitative measurements yielded nearly identical ED50 values, demonstrating high comparability.
    • No significant differences were observed between the tested methods and regimens.

    Conclusions:

    • Both quantal and quantitative measurements are reliable for drug discrimination studies.
    • Discrete and cumulative dosing strategies are interchangeable for assessing drug effects.
    • The findings support the accurate comparability of drug discrimination data obtained through various techniques.