Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

High Yield Purification of Plasmodium falciparum Merozoites For Use in Opsonizing Antibody Assays
Published on: July 17, 2014
Coma scales for children with severe falciparum malaria
C R Newton1, T Chokwe, J A Schellenberg
1Kenya Medical Research Institute, Clinical Research Centre, Kilifi Unit, Kenya. cnewton@ich.ucl.ac.uk
The Blantyre coma scale (BCS) and Adelaide coma scale (ACS) showed poor inter-observer agreement in assessing severe pediatric malaria. The ACS was more sensitive for detecting complications, while the BCS better assessed overall incapacity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Assessment Tools
Background:
- The Blantyre coma scale (BCS) is crucial for assessing children with severe falciparum malaria and cerebral malaria.
- Formal validation of the BCS, especially in comparison to other scales like the Adelaide coma scale (ACS), is lacking.
- Accurate neurological assessment is vital for managing severe pediatric malaria and predicting outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the Blantyre coma scale (BCS) with the Adelaide coma scale (ACS) in Kenyan children with severe malaria.
- To evaluate the inter-observer agreement for both coma scales.
- To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the BCS and ACS for detecting clinical events and neurological sequelae.
Main Methods:
- Inter-observer agreement was assessed for the BCS and ACS using proportion of agreement (PA), disagreement rate (DR), and kappa (kappa n) among three observers on 17 children.
- Sensitivity and specificity of both scales were evaluated in detecting seizures and hypoglycemia in 240 children.
- The scales' ability to predict neurological sequelae and overall incapacity was analyzed.
Main Results:
- Significant inter-observer disagreement was found for both BCS (kappa n = 0.27) and ACS (kappa n = 0.31), with the BCS verbal component showing particularly low agreement (kappa n = 0.02).
- The BCS demonstrated higher specificity (0.85 vs. 0.80) but lower sensitivity (0.25-0.69 vs. 0.38-0.88) compared to the ACS in detecting clinical events.
- The ACS was a better predictor of neurological sequelae, whereas the BCS provided a more comprehensive assessment of overall incapacity in severe malaria.
Conclusions:
- Both the Blantyre coma scale and Adelaide coma scale exhibit limitations in inter-observer reliability for assessing severe pediatric malaria.
- The Adelaide coma scale appears more sensitive for detecting acute neurological complications, while the Blantyre coma scale may offer a broader measure of disability.
- Further refinement and validation of coma scales are needed to improve the accuracy of neurological assessment and outcome prediction in severe pediatric malaria.
More Related Videos
05:28Standard Membrane Feeding Assay for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles Mosquito Vectors
Published on: May 12, 2022
07:20Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
Malaria