Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time to detect the difference between two images presented side by side

N Brunel1, J Ninio

  • 1Laboratoire de Physique Statistique, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France. brunel@physique.ens.fr

Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The AI Innerve Algorithm: Automatic Reproducible Reading for Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density Analysis, a New Tool for Small-Fiber Neuropathy Diagnosis.

European journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Emergence of Irregular Activity in Networks of Strongly Coupled Conductance-Based Neurons.

Physical review. X·2022
Same author

Astrocytes: Orchestrating synaptic plasticity?

Neuroscience·2015
Same author

A ternary cellular complex between B and T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells?

Immunology today·2014
Same author

Insights into Populus XIP aquaporins: evolutionary expansion, protein functionality, and environmental regulation.

Journal of experimental botany·2012
Same author

Paradoxical fusion of two images and depth perception with a squinting eye.

Vision research·2009
Same journal

Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

On the neural basis of focused and divided attention.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Task difficulty in a simultaneous face matching task modulates activity in face fusiform area.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

The role of the left Brodmann's areas 44 and 45 in reading words and pseudowords.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
See all related articles

Detecting image differences relies on abstract shape analysis, not point-by-point comparison. Reaction times increase with image complexity, suggesting visual processing occurs in chunks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding visual short-term memory is crucial for human-computer interaction.
  • Previous research suggests visual information is processed in discrete units.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how image complexity affects the time taken to detect differences between artificial images.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of visual comparison and short-term memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed pairs of artificial images (N x N lattices) on a CRT screen and reported differences.
  • Image complexity was manipulated by varying size, irregularity, and the presence of a grid.
  • Reaction times and error rates were recorded for same/different judgments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Median reaction time increased quadratically with image size (N x N), following cN^2.
  • Performance was robust to moderate image irregularity and uncorrelated distortions.
  • Reaction times were 20% higher with a grid; 'same' judgments took longer and had more errors for N >= 4.

Conclusions:

  • Difference detection is mediated by abstract shape analysis, not a pixel-by-pixel scan.
  • A shift from single inspection to scanning occurs around N=4.
  • Visual information is processed in chunks of approximately 12 +/- 3 bits, with 50 ms per quadrangle pair.