Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal phosphor thickness for portal imaging

J P Bissonnette1, I A Cunningham, P Munro

  • 1London Regional Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada. bissonj@ere.umontreal.ca

Medical Physics
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment and management of frailty during pulmonary rehabilitation: An international survey of Australian and New Zealand clinicians.

Chronic respiratory disease·2025
Same author

Poster - Thur Eve - 05: Safety systems and failure modes and effects analysis for a magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

SU-E-J-39: Minimizing IGRT Imaging Exposures: KV Radiograph Vs. KV-CBCT Vs. MV Portal Images.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

SU-E-I-15: Comparison of State-Of-The-Art Interpolation-Based Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) Algorithms for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Sci-Sat AM(1): Imaging-07: Open field normalization: How to avoid inflation to MTF and DQE values caused by zero-frequency normalization.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Robust PET-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2015
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Quantum accounting diagram (QAD) analysis optimized portal imaging systems by evaluating detective quantum efficiency (DQE) and image quality indices. Optimal phosphor screen thickness varied by system design and imaging task, with diminishing returns beyond 400 mg/cm2.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiological Imaging
  • Image Quality Assessment

Background:

  • Portal imaging systems are crucial for radiotherapy localization.
  • Optimizing detector design is essential for improving image quality and treatment accuracy.
  • Quantum accounting diagram (QAD) analysis provides a theoretical framework for evaluating imaging system performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the optimal phosphor screen thickness for two portal imaging system designs using QAD analysis.
  • To assess the impact of screen thickness on spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency (DQE).
  • To calculate indices of displayed and perceived image quality for different imaging tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Calculated spatial-frequency-dependent DQE using QAD analysis for video camera and amorphous silicon portal imaging systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured physical characteristics of eight x-ray detectors with varying phosphor screen thicknesses (67-947 mg/cm2).
  • Determined image quality indices for pelvis and point-like objects to identify optimal screen thickness.

    • Main Results:

    • Maximal image quality indices were achieved with screen thicknesses between 358 and 947 mg/cm2, varying by system and object.
    • No single optimal screen thickness was identified; it depended on the specific imaging task.
    • Image quality improvements were modest for phosphor screens thicker than 350-400 mg/cm2.

    Conclusions:

    • Phosphor screen thickness significantly impacts portal imaging system performance and image quality.
    • QAD analysis is a valuable tool for optimizing linear imaging system design.
    • Task-dependent optimization is necessary, suggesting a balance between screen thickness and desired image characteristics.