Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Unfounded doubt in laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

P M Go1, W F van Erp

  • 1St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, afd. Chirurgie, Nieuwegein.

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|April 5, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world.

Surgical technology international·2011
Same author

[The 'Inguinal Hernia' guideline of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2003
Same author

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day care; implementation of a guideline for clinical practice].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2003
Same author

Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003
Same author

Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003
Same author

[Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2002
Same journal

[Insulin intoxications caused by falsified semaglutide].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[Professional skepticism in medical research].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[Improving mobility in painful osteoarthritis].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[The effectiveness and costs of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS) work-integrated care pathway on return to work for patients receiving knee arthroplasty].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[The rise of genetic therapies: urgent moral and societal questions].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[A man with a wound on his elbow].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers faster recovery and better visualization compared to traditional methods. Despite initial concerns about operative time, its benefits in patient recovery and surgical view outweigh the drawbacks, making it a superior surgical option.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy emerged in the late 1980s.
  • It was initially favored for smaller incisions, reduced postoperative pain, and quicker recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the controversy regarding the operative time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to minilaparotomy.
  • To reaffirm the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patient recovery and surgical visualization.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional large-incision surgery and minilaparotomy.
  • Evaluation of postoperative pain, recovery time, and surgical view.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy demonstrates faster patient recovery than conventional large-incision surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The laparoscopic approach provides a superior surgical view compared to minilaparotomy.
  • While potentially longer in operative time than minilaparotomy, the overall patient benefits are significant.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a valuable surgical technique.
    • The benefits of faster recovery and improved visualization justify its use over traditional methods.
    • Criticism regarding operative time is outweighed by enhanced patient outcomes.