Related Experiment Videos
[Trauma diagnosis: difficulty in differentiating between recall and fantasy]
1Abteilung für Psychiatrie, Universität Columbia/USA.
Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie
|March 1, 1997
Summary
Psychoanalytic theory blurred the lines between fantasy and memory, hindering trauma reporting. This paper distinguishes traumatic memories from fantasies, explaining why trauma recall is increasing.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychoanalysis
- Trauma Studies
Background:
- Psychoanalytic literature has historically lacked case reports on abuse and its consequences.
- Theories emphasizing psychic reality and mental construction of knowledge may have obscured the distinction between unconscious fantasies and repressed memories.
- This has led to diminished interest in uncovering trauma and historical reality within psychoanalysis.
Observation:
- Presents an adult analysis detailing the recovery of a dissociated memory of adolescent sexual abuse.
- Uses this case to explore theoretical challenges psychoanalysts face when addressing trauma.
- Discusses the potential for distinguishing repressed memories from unconscious fantasies based on their encoding and storage.
Findings:
- Traumatic memories and unconscious fantasies may be encoded and stored differently.
- The sequelae of trauma and fantasy can often be disentangled, though not always.
- Describes various modes of trauma encoding and different ways of remembering, re-experiencing, and re-enacting traumatic events.
Implications:
- Suggests that a clearer distinction between trauma and fantasy is possible, aiding therapeutic work.
- Highlights the importance of understanding memory encoding in processing trauma.
- Proposes reasons for the increasing accessibility of traumatic memories for patients in contemporary psychoanalysis.