Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research

H Brenner1, M Blettner

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Ulm, Germany.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post-operative C-reactive protein as a strong independent predictor of long-term colorectal cancer outcomes: consistent findings from two large patient cohorts.

ESMO open·2024
Same author

Genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization analyses provide insights into the causes of early-onset colorectal cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
Same author

Sensitivity of a blood ctDNA-based multimodal test for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
Same author

Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

Correction: Prediction of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular, mixed, and all-cause dementia by a polygenic risk score and APOE status in a community-based cohort prospectively followed over 17 years.

Molecular psychiatry·2021
Same author

Prediction of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, vascular, mixed, and all-cause dementia by a polygenic risk score and APOE status in a community-based cohort prospectively followed over 17 years.

Molecular psychiatry·2020
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Controlling for confounding in logistic regression is crucial. Linear terms often suffice, but categorizing confounders can cause significant residual confounding, necessitating alternative methods like polynomial or spline regression.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiologic research
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Multiple regression models, including logistic regression, are standard for controlling confounding in epidemiology.
  • Accurate specification of covariate-risk associations is essential for parametric models.
  • Residual confounding can arise from incorrect confounder-risk association modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the magnitude of residual confounding with traditional methods for continuous confounders in logistic regression.
  • To compare the effectiveness of linear terms versus categorized confounders.
  • To evaluate alternative modeling strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation of confounder-risk associations under various assumptions.
  • Application of multiple logistic regression with different confounder specifications (linear term, categorization).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of residual confounding across methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Including a single linear term for confounders often provides adequate control, even with model assumption violations.
    • Categorizing continuous confounders, especially with few categories, frequently leads to substantial residual confounding.
    • Polynomial and linear spline regression offer useful alternatives for controlling confounding.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of how to model continuous confounders significantly impacts residual confounding in logistic regression.
    • Linear term inclusion is often robust, while categorization can be problematic.
    • Advanced methods like polynomial or spline regression should be considered for improved confounding control.