Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic colposuspension. Is it cost-effective?

K Loveridge1, A Malouf, C Kennedy

  • 1Strathfield Private Hospital, University of Sydney, 3 Everton Road, Strathfield NSW 2135, Australia.

Surgical Endoscopy
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic colposuspension is as cost-effective as open surgery, demonstrating equal safety and efficacy. This minimally invasive approach offers future cost efficiencies and improved patient productivity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Common bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance trends cultured from respiratory, ear, dental and nasolacrimal duct infections in rabbits (2018-2024): 74 isolates.

Australian veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Resilient outcomes in people with a history of mental disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international 2-years longitudinal prospective study.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2025
Same author

Myelopathy caused by Cladophialophora bantiana in a dog and a cat.

Australian veterinary journal·2025
Same author

Global recommendations on adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

Facts, views & vision in ObGyn·2024
Same author

Trauma-informed Approaches to Substance Use Interventions with Indigenous Peoples: A Scoping Review.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2021
Same author

Editorial: Diagnostic Testing for SARS-Coronavirus-2 in the Nursing Facility: Recommendations of a Delphi Panel of Long-Term Care Clinicians.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2020

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Widespread adoption of laparoscopic surgery requires proof of cost-effectiveness alongside safety and technical efficacy.
  • A comparative analysis of open versus laparoscopic colposuspension was conducted.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic colposuspension versus the traditional open approach.
  • To evaluate the safety and technical effectiveness of the laparoscopic technique.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective controlled review of patient records and in-hospital costs.
  • Cost-analysis comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension in 54 patients at a private hospital.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic surgery incurred higher theater costs but was offset by reduced accommodation expenses due to shorter hospital stays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Overall in-hospital costs were comparable between the laparoscopic and open colposuspension groups.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic colposuspension is a safe, effective, and not more expensive alternative to open surgery.
    • Future advancements in laparoscopic techniques are expected to enhance cost efficiency and patient productivity.