Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?

C W Cunningham1

  • 1Zoology Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA. cliff@acpub.duke.edu

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

THE EVOLUTION OF GAMETIC INCOMPATIBILITY IN NEOTROPICAL ECHINOMETRA: A REPLY TO MCCLARY.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

GAMETIC INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN SPECIES OF THE SEA URCHIN ECHINOMETRA ON THE TWO SIDES OF THE ISTHMUS OF PANAMA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

MOLECULAR AND GEOLOGIC EVIDENCE OF SHARED HISTORY BETWEEN HERMIT CRABS AND THE SYMBIOTIC GENUS HYDRACTINIA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

EXPERIMENTAL MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF BACTERIOPHAGE T7.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

BEST-FIT MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD MODELS FOR PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE: EMPIRICAL TESTS WITH KNOWN PHYLOGENIES.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Combining data in phylogenetic analysis.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same journal

Segmentally Duplicated Regulatory Elements Undergo Human-Specific Rewiring.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

The life history of recessive deleterious alleles as seen through the eyes of a honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: Insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Testing for data incongruence is crucial in phylogenetics. The incongruence length difference (ILD) test effectively predicts when combining data improves phylogenetic accuracy, unlike other methods.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Data partition incongruence can indicate distinct evolutionary histories or conflicting phylogenetic signals.
  • Conditional combination strategies in phylogenetics advocate for testing incongruence before merging datasets.
  • Understanding the relationship between incongruence and phylogenetic accuracy is vital for robust evolutionary inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between data partition incongruence and overall phylogenetic accuracy.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of three incongruence tests in predicting the impact of data combination on phylogeny reconstruction.
  • To determine if incongruence testing can guide decisions on combining or analyzing separate data partitions.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied three incongruence tests: incongruence length difference (ILD), Templeton, and Rodrigo tests.
  • Utilized pairs of mitochondrial DNA data partitions from established vertebrate phylogenies.
  • Assessed the impact of combining incongruent partitions on phylogenetic accuracy compared to individual partitions.

Main Results:

  • The ILD test (partition homogeneity test) effectively differentiated between data combinations that improved and those that degraded phylogenetic accuracy.
  • The Templeton and Rodrigo tests frequently identified significant incongruence even when combining partitions enhanced phylogenetic accuracy.
  • All tested methods indicated that refining reconstruction models could improve the phylogenetic accuracy of individual data partitions.

Conclusions:

  • The ILD test is a valuable tool for assessing data compatibility in phylogenetic analyses.
  • Over-reliance on certain incongruence tests may lead to suboptimal data combination strategies.
  • Improving molecular evolution models is essential for maximizing phylogenetic accuracy, particularly with incongruent datasets.