Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques

J West1, J M Fitzpatrick, M Y Wang

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep Learning Segmentation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert on 3T MRI.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same author

Apathy in depression: An arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI study.

Journal of psychiatric research·2022
Same author

Performance of image guided navigation in laparoscopic liver surgery - A systematic review.

Surgical oncology·2021
Same author

Structural abnormalities associated with poor outcome of a major depressive episode: The role of thalamus.

Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging·2020
Same author

Exposure of pregnant women to organophosphate insecticides and child motor inhibition at the age of 10-12 years evaluated by fMRI.

Environmental research·2020
Same author

Comparison of manual and semi-automatic registration in augmented reality image-guided liver surgery: a clinical feasibility study.

Surgical endoscopy·2020

Blinded evaluation of retrospective image registration techniques showed potential for satisfactory results. However, visual inspection is crucial to prevent significant errors in neurosurgical applications.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Neurosurgery
  • Image Registration

Background:

  • Accurate image registration is vital for neurosurgical planning and guidance.
  • Retrospective image registration methods are widely used but require rigorous evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a blinded evaluation of retrospective image registration techniques.
  • To compare retrospective registration accuracy with a prospective, marker-based gold standard.
  • To assess the impact of geometrical distortion correction in MR images on registration accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized CT, MR, and PET image volumes from neurosurgery patients with fiducial markers.
  • Removed markers and provided anonymized data to external collaborators for retrospective registration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluated registration accuracy using Target Registration Error (TRE) at multiple volumes of interest (VOIs).

    • Main Results:

    • Presented statistics on TRE for various retrospective registration techniques.
    • Provided descriptions of each technique, including preparation and execution times.
    • Quantified registration errors before and after geometrical distortion correction in MR images.

    Conclusions:

    • Retrospective image registration techniques can yield satisfactory results in many neurosurgical cases.
    • Visual inspection of retrospective registrations is essential to identify and mitigate potential large errors.
    • Geometrical distortion correction may influence the accuracy of MR image registration.