Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Safety of surfaces and equipment for children in playgrounds
1Department of Child Health, University of Wales College of Medicine Academic Centre, Llandough Hospital, Penarth, Vale of Glamorgan, UK.
Insights
Playground safety is crucial. Rubber or bark surfaces significantly reduce child injuries compared to concrete. Monkey bars and excessive equipment height increase fracture risks, necessitating safer design standards.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Safety
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Playground safety is vital for child injury prevention.
- Existing studies often lack real-world epidemiological data.
- This study investigated playground surface, equipment type, and height safety in Cardiff, UK.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety of different playground surfaces.
- To evaluate injury risks associated with various playground equipment types and heights.
- To provide data for improved playground safety standards.
Main Methods:
- Correlational study of 330 injured children (0-14 years) in Cardiff.
- Analysis of hospital records and parental interviews.
- Injury rates correlated with playground surfaces, equipment types, and fall heights.
Main Results:
- Concrete surfaces showed significantly higher injury rates than bark or rubber (p < 0.001).
- Rubber surfaces had the lowest injury risk, half that of bark and a fifth of concrete.
- Monkey bars posed twice the injury risk of climbing frames and seven times that of swings/slides; equipment height correlated with fractures (p = 0.005).
Conclusions:
- Rubber and bark surfacing are recommended for public playgrounds due to lower injury rates.
- Rubberised surfaces offer superior protection over bark, especially for fractures.
- Monkey bars should be avoided, and safety standards updated using epidemiological data, considering fall height limits.
Background:
The safety of playgrounds is important to protect children from injury, but studies are mostly done mainly under laboratory conditions without epidemiological data. We investigated the safety of different playground surfaces, and types and heights of equipment in public playgrounds in the City of Cardiff, UK.
Methods:
We did a correlational study of 330 children aged between 0 and 14 years. All children were hurt when playing in playgrounds in Cardiff and presented to the Accident and Emergency Department in Cardiff Royal Infirmary during summer (April to September) 1992 and 1993, and the whole of 1994. We studied the children's hospital records to establish the type of injury and interviewed their parents to find out the playground and type of equipment involved. The main outcome measures were the number of children injured whilst playing, and injury rates per observed number of children on different surfaces, types, and heights of equipment.
Findings:
Children sustained significantly more injuries in playgrounds with concrete surfaces than in those with bark or rubberised surfaces (p < 0.001). Playgrounds with rubber surfaces had the lowest rate of injury, with a risk half that of bark and a fifth of that of concrete. Bark surfaces were not significantly more protective against arm fractures than concrete. Most injuries were equipment related. Injury risk due to falls from monkey bars (suspended parallel bars or rings between which children swing) was twice that for climbing-frames and seven times that for swings or slides. The height of the equipment correlated significantly with the number of fractures (p = 0.005) from falls.
Interpretation:
Rubber or bark surfacing is associated with a low rate of injuries and we support their use in all public playgrounds. Bark alone is insufficient, however, to prevent all injuries, particularly arm fractures. Rubberised impact-absorbing surfaces are safer than bark. We believe that playing on monkeys bars increases the risk of injury in playgrounds and that they should generally not be installed. Safety standards should be based on physical and epidemiological data. Our data suggest that the proposed raising of the maximum fall height from 2.5 m to 3.0 m in Europe is worrying.
Related Concept Videos
Handwashing I: Introduction and Types of Equipment
Hand wash basins in clinical areas should have faucets that can be turned on and off without using the hands; that is, they should be non-touch or lever-operated.
Personal Protective Equipment
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Survey Safety
Design Example: Designing Water Slide
Bernoulli's principle determines the water's velocity along the slide.
Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc

