Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Fibrinolytic treatment in suspected acute myocardial infarction--use and risks in clinical practice
B Beermann1, C von Bahr, A Sundström
1Department of Drug Epidemiology, Information and Inspection, Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Insights
Fibrinolytic treatment adherence for suspected myocardial infarction varied significantly across Swedish hospitals in 1994. This suggests suboptimal use of these critical reperfusion therapies in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Adherence to fibrinolytic treatment guidelines for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is crucial for patient outcomes.
- Variability in clinical practice may indicate suboptimal care delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess adherence to guidelines for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected myocardial infarction.
- To investigate the occurrence of severe events and treatment patterns in Swedish clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection from 69 Swedish coronary care units over 4 months in 1994.
- Inclusion of 9,726 patients admitted for suspected acute myocardial infarction.
- Analysis of treatment adherence, delays, and drug choices.
Main Results:
- Only 56% of eligible patients received timely fibrinolytic treatment (delay < 12 hours, no contraindications).
- Significant interhospital variation in treatment rates (18.1%–94.1%).
- Delayed treatment (> 24 hours) occurred in 12.5% of women and 15.7% of men; 36.1% of confirmed AMI patients received fibrinolysis.
Conclusions:
- Fibrinolytic therapy appears to be used inconsistently across hospitals.
- Implementation of local quality improvement systems is recommended to enhance patient care.
Objectives:
To study the adherence to guidelines concerning fibrinolytic treatment of patients with suspected myocardial infarction and to obtain information on severe events in clinical practice.
Methods:
Prospective reporting of all patients admitted for suspected acute myocardial infarction during 4 months in 1994 from 69 (73.4% of all) Swedish coronary care units.
Results:
The study covers 10,652 admissions, representing 9726 patients. The mean percentage treated with fibrinolytic drugs of patients with a positive ECG (ST-elevation and/or bundle branch block), a delay < 12 h and no contraindications was 56%. The interhospital range was 18.1-94.1%. Fibrinolytic drugs were given with a delay time > 24 h in 12.5% of women and 15.7% of men, and 36.1% of patients with verified acute myocardial infarction were given fibrinolytic drugs. Streptokinase was used in 82.7% and alteplase in 15.5% of the patients, respectively (interhospital range 0-53.3%).
Conclusions:
Fibrinolytic therapy seems to be used in a non-rational way at several hospitals. Local quality systems may be a way to assure better care.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

