Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why does removing machines count as "passive" euthanasia?

P D Hopkins

    The Hastings Center Report
    |May 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Bad copies. How popular media represent cloning as an ethical problem.

    The Hastings Center reportยท1998
    See all related articles

    The intuitive distinction between passive and active euthanasia is challenged. Examining the role of medical technology reveals that human intervention is present in both scenarios, blurring lines of guilt and innocence.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Technology

    Background:

    • The common distinction between passive and active euthanasia relies on intuitive notions of nature versus human artifice.
    • This distinction is often criticized for being problematic yet retains intuitive appeal in differentiating actions leading to death.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically examine the intuitive distinction between passive and active euthanasia.
    • To explore the role of medical technology and "artifice" in end-of-life decisions.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of the concepts of "nature" and "artifice" in medical contexts.
    • Conceptual examination of the functional relevance of medical machines to patient bodies.

    Main Results:

    • The intuitive appeal of the passive/active euthanasia distinction erodes upon closer scrutiny.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Medical machines and technological interventions are integral to patient care and end-of-life processes, challenging the idea of "nature taking its course" in passive scenarios.
  • The perceived innocence associated with passive euthanasia and guilt with active euthanasia becomes less clear when the role of technology is considered.

    • Conclusions:

    • The traditional distinction between passive and active euthanasia is philosophically and ethically questionable.
    • A deeper understanding of medical technology's role complicates moral judgments about end-of-life interventions.
    • Re-evaluating guilt and innocence in euthanasia requires moving beyond simplistic nature/artifice dichotomies.