Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining blood pressure in pregnancy. Positional hydrostatic effects

M Hallak1, S F Bottoms, K Knudson

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Positional effects on blood pressure in pregnant women are not immediate and not explained by hydrostatic pressure. Current guidelines for blood pressure measurement in pregnancy may need revision.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abdominal Pregnancy - A Constant Location? A Case Report of an Omental Viable Pregnancy and Review of Literature.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
Same author

Gonadotropin stimulation in mice leads to ovarian accumulation of immature myeloid cells and altered expression of proangiogenic genes.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2014
Same author

Unique expression patterns associated with preferential recruitment of immature myeloid cells into angiogenic versus dormant tumors.

Genes and immunity·2013
Same author

First trimester diagnosis of forked cord in monoamniotic twin pregnancy.

Placenta·2011
Same author

Suspected macrosomia? Better not tell.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2008
Same author

Multiple brain infarcts associated with severe preeclampsia.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2007

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Cardiovascular Physiology

Background:

  • Blood pressure measurement in pregnant women is critical for monitoring maternal and fetal health.
  • Hydrostatic pressure can influence blood pressure readings based on body position.
  • Standard guidelines recommend positioning the blood pressure cuff at heart level to minimize hydrostatic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the immediate effects of different body positions on blood pressure determination in pregnant women.
  • To assess whether hydrostatic pressure explains observed positional blood pressure changes during pregnancy.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty healthy pregnant women (34-41 weeks gestation) had blood pressure measured in sitting, left lateral, right lateral, and supine positions.
  • A two-minute stabilization period was observed between position changes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bisacromial diameter was measured, and multivariate analysis of variance was used for statistical evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • Systolic blood pressure was slightly higher in the right arm compared to the left (2.6 mm Hg, P < .05).
    • No significant differences were found in diastolic blood pressure between arms.
    • Immediate blood pressure readings in lateral positions were not affected by the cuff's position relative to the heart, and observed pressures differed significantly from theoretical hydrostatic predictions (P < .0001).

    Conclusions:

    • Immediate positional effects on blood pressure in pregnant women are not attributable to hydrostatic pressure.
    • The blood pressure reduction observed with prolonged lateral positioning is unlikely an artifact of hydrostatic effects.
    • Current recommendations for blood pressure measurement in pregnancy may require revision, as repositioning to the supine position with the cuff at heart level may be unnecessary or detrimental to fetal perfusion.