Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Saliva cotinine levels as a function of collection method

N G Schneider1, P Jacob, F Nilsson

  • 1West LA VA Medical Center, CA 90073, USA.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Saliva cotinine levels, used to measure nicotine intake, vary with collection methods. Sugar or wax stimulation significantly lowers cotinine levels compared to unstimulated saliva, impacting nicotine exposure assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Excitonic Insulators and Superfluidity in Two-Dimensional Bilayers without External Fields.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2023
Same author

Surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma: a case series on factors influencing the risk of an incomplete primary excision.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Is dissolved COD a suitable design parameter for ozone oxidation of organic micropollutants in wastewater?

The Science of the total environment·2018
Same author

First-principle simulations of electronic structure in semicrystalline polyethylene.

The Journal of chemical physics·2017
Same author

Preoperative prediction of histopathological outcome in basal cell carcinoma: flat surface and multiple small erosions predict superficial basal cell carcinoma in lighter skin types.

The British journal of dermatology·2016
Same author

Gender differences in the pharmacology of nicotine addiction.

Addiction biology·2016

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Saliva cotinine is a key biomarker for assessing nicotine intake.
  • Variations in laboratory collection methods can affect saliva cotinine measurements.
  • Standardizing collection techniques is crucial for accurate nicotine exposure assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare saliva cotinine levels obtained through different collection methods.
  • To evaluate the impact of sugar and wax stimulation on saliva cotinine concentrations.
  • To assess the reliability of repeated unstimulated saliva samples for cotinine measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Three small trials were conducted comparing different saliva collection techniques.
  • Trial 1: Sugar-stimulated vs. unstimulated saliva (n=29).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Trial 2: Wax chewing vs. unstimulated saliva (n=15).
  • Trial 3: Two consecutive unstimulated saliva samples (n=10).

    • Main Results:

    • Sugar-stimulated saliva showed 26% lower cotinine levels than unstimulated saliva (p < 0.001), with high correlation (r=0.90).
    • Wax-stimulated saliva showed 6% lower cotinine levels than unstimulated saliva (p < 0.05), with very high correlation (r=0.98).
    • No significant differences were found between two consecutive unstimulated saliva samples (r=0.99).

    Conclusions:

    • Saliva collection methods significantly influence measured cotinine levels, with stimulation reducing concentrations.
    • Changes in salivary flow rate are postulated to explain the observed differences.
    • Standardized, unstimulated saliva collection is recommended for consistent nicotine intake estimation.