Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for dyspepsia management in general practice using focus groups

A P Hungin1, G P Rubin, A J Russell

  • 1Northern Primary Care Research Network (NoReN), Health Centre, Eaglescliffe, Stockton on Tees.

The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
|May 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are Mental Health, Family and Childhood Adversity, Substance Use and Conduct Problems Risk Factors for Offending in Autism?

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2020
Same author

Self-reported motivations for engaging or declining to engage in cyber-dependent offending and the role of autistic traits.

Research in developmental disabilities·2020
Same author

Adapting Psychological Therapies for Autism - Therapist Experience, Skills and Confidence.

Research in autism spectrum disorders·2018
Same author

Cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a proof of concept randomised controlled trial.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2017
Same author

Inhibition of prolyl 4-hydroxylase decreases muscle fibrosis following chronic rotator cuff tear.

Bone & joint research·2017
Same author

Symptom appraisal and healthcare-seeking for symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2015
Same journal

Access to general practice: why policy must be rural-proofed.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same journal

What the codes don't say.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Team-based continuity.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Books: The Morbid Age: Britain Between the Wars.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Sex, violence, and moral ambiguity in <i>Once Upon a Time in the West</i>.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Yonder: Pattern disruption, health inequalities in GP training, waiting for mental health treatment, and shared decision making.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
See all related articles

Developing clinical guidelines for dyspepsia management using focus groups proved effective. This approach enhanced general practitioners' (GPs) understanding and created patient-centered, flexible management strategies.

Area of Science:

  • General Practice
  • Clinical Guideline Development
  • Dyspepsia Management

Background:

  • Limited guidelines exist for general practice dyspepsia management, often prioritizing investigations over patient-centered approaches.
  • Focus groups offer a novel method to understand practitioner perspectives in real-world settings for guideline creation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for managing dyspepsia in general practice.
  • To evaluate the utility of focus groups comprising general practitioners (GPs) in the guideline development process.

Main Methods:

  • Initial guidelines were drafted by GPs and an audit facilitator.
  • Three focus groups involving 30 GPs across distinct locations discussed and refined the guidelines.
  • Anthropological analysis informed modifications based on GP knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Developed patient-centered guidelines incorporating patient concerns and clinician uncertainties, allowing flexible management.
  • Focus group methodology facilitated broad GP exposure to guideline development, promoting dissemination, peer review, and educational challenges.
  • Guidelines emphasized principles of good consultation and individual patient management.

Conclusions:

  • Focus groups are a viable method for developing practical, evidence-based dyspepsia guidelines.
  • This approach fosters GP ownership, peer review, identifies educational needs, and aids in disseminating best practices.
  • The methodology supports the creation and local application of professionally acceptable clinical guidelines nationally.