Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mutation rates as adaptations

C Maley1

  • 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA. cmaley@ai.mit.edu

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|June 7, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Life

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Carbon dating cancer: defining the chronology of metastatic progression in colorectal cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncologyยท2017
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Theoretical biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Understanding life's diversity requires exploring beyond known biological constraints.
  • Coevolutionary dynamics play a crucial role in shaping species and genetic traits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how evolving mutation rates influence coevolutionary interactions.
  • To model the impact of different interaction types on mutation rate evolution.

Main Methods:

  • A simple coevolutionary model was developed.
  • Incorporated a gene controlling individual mutation rates, allowing it to evolve.
  • Simulated interactions with varying consequences for participants.

Main Results:

  • Lineages in zero-sum game interactions evolved higher mutation rates.
  • Lineages in interactions with unequal consequences evolved lower mutation rates.

Conclusions:

  • Coevolutionary pressures from interaction types can drive differential mutation rates.
  • The nature of inter-individual interactions may explain genetic mutation rate variation.