Related Experiment Videos
[Evaluation of a course for nurses aides by the students]
Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da U S P
|April 1, 1997
Summary
Nursing students in a comparative study found auxiliary course quality excellent. Course duration, training, and content were deemed sufficient, with the library being a highly utilized resource.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education
- Health Sciences Education
Background:
- Evaluating the effectiveness of auxiliary nursing courses is crucial for improving healthcare training.
- Student feedback provides valuable insights into course quality, duration, training, and content.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare how two student groups evaluate auxiliary nursing courses.
- To assess student perceptions of course quality, duration, training, and theoretical content.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study design was employed.
- Data were collected using questionnaires distributed at the end of the courses.
- Two distinct student groups participated in the evaluation.
Main Results:
- The majority of students in both groups rated the course quality as excellent.
- Course duration, training, and theoretical content were considered sufficient by most participants.
- The library was identified as a frequently used resource by students during the courses.
Conclusions:
- Auxiliary nursing courses are generally perceived positively by students regarding quality and content.
- Course structure and resources, including the library, adequately support student learning.
- Student feedback mechanisms are effective for evaluating and enhancing nursing education programs.