Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpretation of bone densitometry studies

G M Blake1, I Fogelman

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pancreas fat quantification with quantitative CT: an MRI correlation analysis.

Clinical radiology·2020
Same author

Preclinical and Clinical Development of ABBV-8E12, a Humanized Anti-Tau Antibody, for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Tauopathies.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2017
Same author

Correction to: 18F-NaF PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for bone imaging.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2017
Same author

Changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover in patients on 'drug holiday' following bisphosphonate therapy: real-life clinic setting.

Clinical endocrinology·2015
Same author

Circulating concentrations of vitamin E isomers: Association with bone turnover and arterial stiffness in post-menopausal women.

Bone·2015
Same author

(18)F-NaF PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for bone imaging.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2015
Same journal

Letter from the Editors.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Expanding Horizons: The Role of Kaleidoscope and Relevant Images in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

The diagnostic performance and clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in pleural mesothelioma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of treating neuroendocrine prostate cancer with anti-SSTR radioligands: A systematic review of imaging and treatment studies.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG -PET/CT in cardiac sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and future directions.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Maximizing diagnostic yield: A systematic review and deep dive into PSMA PET scan protocol variations for prostate cancer.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
See all related articles

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) helps diagnose osteoporosis and monitor treatment. For elderly patients, Z-scores may offer a better fracture risk assessment than T-scores.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a cornerstone for osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
  • Accurate interpretation of bone mineral density (BMD) by physicians is crucial for patient management.
  • Existing diagnostic criteria, like T-scores, present challenges, particularly in elderly populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the principles of interpreting bone mineral density (BMD) studies using DXA.
  • To discuss the utility of T-scores versus Z-scores for assessing fracture risk.
  • To highlight optimal sites and significant changes for monitoring osteoporosis treatment response.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature and guidelines concerning DXA interpretation for osteoporosis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of T-score and Z-score methodologies and their clinical application.
  • Evaluation of evidence regarding optimal BMD measurement sites and statistically significant change thresholds.

    • Main Results:

    • Osteoporosis diagnosis often relies on T-scores, comparing BMD to young adult means.
    • T-scores may be less informative for fracture risk in the elderly; Z-scores (comparing to age-matched peers) are argued to be superior.
    • The posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine projection is confirmed as optimal for monitoring treatment response.
    • A 4.5% change in BMD is statistically significant for detecting treatment effects.

    Conclusions:

    • DXA interpretation requires clear reporting to guide clinical decisions.
    • Z-scores may provide a more relevant fracture risk assessment for elderly individuals compared to T-scores.
    • Standardized monitoring protocols, including optimal sites and significant change thresholds, are essential for effective osteoporosis management.