Characterization of PACAP receptors and signaling pathways in rabbit gastric muscle cells

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) receptors and their signaling pathways were characterized in dispersed rabbit gastric muscle cells. 125I-PACAP-27 and 125I-vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) binding to muscle cells were inhibited equally by PACAP and VIP (mean inhibitory concentration 0.8 to 1.3 nM) and desensitized to the same extent (70-80%) by exposure to either peptide. PACAP, like VIP, increased cytosolic free Ca2+ and the formation of L-[3H]citrulline, NO-3/NO-2, guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), and adenosine 3'5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) and induced relaxation (mean effective concentration 1.8 +/- 0.1 nM) that was partly inhibited by NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), VIP-(10-28), and PACAP 6-38. L-[3H]citrulline and cGMP formation were blocked by nifedipine, L-NNA, and pertussis toxin (PTx), implying activation of a G protein-coupled, Ca(2+)-calmodulin-dependent nitric oxide (NO) synthase. PACAP-induced relaxation was inhibited to the same extent (46-49%) by nifedipine, L-NNA, PTx, and the protein kinase G inhibitor KT-5823; the inhibition reflected the component of relaxation mediated by the NO-cGMP pathway. The residual relaxation was abolished by the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89. The pattern of inhibition of all responses was identical to that observed with VIP. Desensitization with VIP or PACAP abolished cAMP formation but had no effect on L-[3H]citrulline and cGMP formation induced by either peptide. Receptor protection with VIP or PACAP preserved fully all responses (L-[3H]citrulline, cGMP, and cAMP formation and relaxation) to either peptide. The complete cross-competition, cross-desensitization, cross-antagonism, and cross-protection of receptors by either VIP or PACAP are consistent with interaction of both peptides with the same receptors; the receptors consist of two classes, each coupled to a distinct signaling pathway.